this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

Buttcoin

417 readers
17 users here now

Buttcoin is the future of online butts. Buttcoin is a peer-to-peer butt. Peer-to-peer means that no central authority issues new butts or tracks butts.

A community for hurling ordure at cryptocurrency/blockchain dweebs of all sorts. We are only here for debate as long as it amuses us. Meme stocks are also on topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

By this point, I think it's pretty obvious that blockchain doesn't have any good use cases beyond financial speculation and scams/fraud.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

YOU WOULD THINK THAT, BUT

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

sanctions evasion and money laundering, and that's basically it

[–] slazer2au 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It has one legitimate use case that I can think of. Immutable audit logs, even then there are better options.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

so in practice it actually doesn't, and enterprise "blockchain" systems tend to evolve:

  1. do the real work in the blockchain bit
  2. do the real work in a program with an SQL database attached, claim the blockchain is for audit logs
  3. every SQL DB can produce those anyway, remove the blockchain bit entirely
  4. don't bother removing the word "blockchain" from your marketing copy

multiple such cases!

[–] slazer2au 0 points 6 months ago

exactly, like I said, there is only 1 thing it could be used for, but there are better options for that anyway.

[–] bitchkat 8 points 6 months ago

Blockchain, the solution in search of a problem.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Careful not to conflate things like hash trees with Blockchains. The former do get used for stuff like certificate transparency logs right now, because it is a sensible technology. Blockchains could do exactly the same thing (because they’re based on the same underlying principle), only with much more expense and waste, so there’s basically no point.