Malicious Compliance

19595 readers

2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

[email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

609

Reddit's API protest just got even more NSFW (mashable.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/maliciouscompliance

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] marcos 1 points 1 year ago

They didn't specify a religion, and the mods made it perfectly clear that they understand it as "any religion at all that exists or existed within somebody's head or in fiction". So, I'm not confident in that "Fuck -> No NSFW" part.

In fact, I'm not confident that "in" or "fact" wouldn't trigger the rule either. And it's better to keep it safe; you don't want to make the site dangerous for those nice and well-liked ads buyers.