Neoliberal
Woke Rainbow Capitalism (nerds)
Trains, free trade, and open borders; trans rights and taco trucks on every corner. Please read the sidebar for more information.
Community Bookmarks
- FAQs
- Latest discussion thread: September 2024
- US Presidential Election 270 to Win Interactive Map
- US Presidential Election 538 Megathread
Rules:
1. Instance Terms of Service
Comply with the Lemmy.world terms of service.
2. Civility
Refrain from name-calling, slapfights, hostility, doxxing, or any uncivil behavior that derails the quality of the conversation.
A specific one of importance you might not generally expect on Lemmy or the wider fediverse, and enforced to further community health, is Do not engage in excessive partisanship.
3. Bigotry
Bigotry of any kind will be sanctioned harshly.
4. Unconstructive Engagement
Do not post with the intent to provoke, mischaracterize, or troll other users rather than meaningfully contributing to the conversation. Don't disrupt serious discussions. Bad opinions are not automatically unconstructive.
Do not reflexively downvote just because someone has a different opinion.
Also, as a general disclaimer, keep in mind that votes on posts and comments are discoverable as they federate with other instances and that is outside the control of this community.
5. Off-topic Comments
Comments on submissions should substantively address the topic of submission.
6. Glorifying Violence
Do not advocate or encourage violence either seriously or jokingly. Do not glorify oppressive/autocratic regimes.
7. Brigading
Refrain from brigading other communities or fediverse instances, or coming from another community or fediverse instance and brigading this community. Links within the community are encouraged provided no other rules are broken.
8. Off-topic, Meta, or Duplicate Post
Submissions should be relevant to public policy or political theory. Meta posts should be posted to the discussion thread. Generally avoid editorializing submission titles.
9. Submission Quality
Low-quality or irrelevant submissions will be removed at mod discretion. This applies in particular to low-quality or repetitive memes.
10. Tag Communities and/or Users Wisely
Do not tag communities and/or users to troll, spam, or brigade.
11. Bonk-Posting/Sexual Content
Go be horny somewhere else. Do not post inappropriate content of a sexual nature. Both SFW and NSFW content can qualify. Repeat infringements can lead to bans.
12. Toxic Nationalism/Regionalism
Refrain from condemning countries and regions or their inhabitants at-large in response to political developments, mocking people for their nationality or region, or advocating for colonialism or imperialism.
Other Fediverse Communities:
We in c/Neoliberal support:
- Free trade and competitive markets
- Immigration
- YIMBYism – ‘yes in my backyard’-ism
- Carbon taxes
- Internationalism and supranational governance – e.g. the EU, UN, NATO, IMF
- LGBTQ+ rights
- Democracy, human rights, civil liberties and due process
Neoliberals can be found in many political parties and we are not dogmatic supporters of specific parties. But we tend to find ourselves agreeing more often with parties that espouse liberal values, internationalism and centrist economics, such as the Democrats in the US, Liberal Democrats in the UK, FDP in Germany, Renaissance/MoDem in France, the Liberal Party in Canada, and so on.
Further Reading:
- I’m a Neoliberal. Maybe You Are Too.
- The Neoliberal Mind
- Neo-Liberalism and its Prospects
- Neoliberalism: the Genesis of a Political Swear Word
News sources:
Here are some suggested news sources that we like and tend to find reliable. Please note that posts and threads are not at all limited to these sources!--
view the rest of the comments
With Roberts, I think this is a prime example of someone I can disagree with on issues and still respect. Alito is someone I cannot respect.
Roberts tried and failed to uphold the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. He’ll now go down in history as a contributor to one of the most regressive phases for the USSC ever.
I agree in that Roberts at least recognizes that his job is to interpret laws as they are passed by Congress and not use the court to legislate.
This, at least, is his intention and he himself says that is “for the people we elect, not for lawyers.” He also pushes back on Windsor’s question about whether or not it’s his job to put the country on a “moral path.”
That being said, I would assert Roberts ended up doing exactly that when he voted with the 6-3 majority on Dobbs. While it is true he did disagree with the majority’s reasoning, and even if he flipped it would not have changed the outcome, he definitely knew the gravity of the courts decision; the court would be fundamentally revoking a right American’s had for nearly half a century.
Regardless of Roberts’ intentions with the court, it is clear that Alito wants to both interpret the law according to his own, theocratic ideology and will twist his interpretations to effectively legislate.
I admire Roberts’ approach to the court, but it only works when all his colleagues act in good faith, and they clearly are not. His pretending otherwise is to live in a fantasy, and it’s really his court in-name-only.
Edit: grammar and clarified Windsor’s question to Roberts.
I would love to see Roberts flex his Chief Justice title and fix some issues, however, similar to his other stances the justices were all nominated by a president and approved by the Senate, knowing what hell they were unleashing. It would be fundamentally flawed for him to enforce his own opinions on judicial activism on others.