cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/20260613
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
95 points (86.8% liked)
Test
141 readers
1 users here now
Test community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The only difference, thermodynamically, is the volume of water. Water of the same volume, in the same container, heated to 100c will cool at the same rate regardless of the heating method. So, your brewing temperature, while important, isn't a difference at all unless you're brewing your black tea directly in the kettle, and I'm not a Brit, but I don't think that's how it's done.
Doesn't latent heat change the time taken to cool? Also part of the point of a kettle being that it's 100c wheras a microwave could easily be under since it turns off based on time.
You can run the microwave again. It's not a one and done thing. Not sure what you mean by latent heat in this case, are you talking about inside the microwave, or the kettle itself or?
Several differences.
The kettle is a lot closer to the cup and has thermal mass. I generally pour with the water at the bottom still boiling slightly. It takes time to get the water out of a microwave and pour it into the pot/cup.
A kettle gets the water to a boil, then stops. A microwave is likely to either overheat (and so waste energy) or under heat, and so be too cold.
The kettle water can be used to easily warm the pot, if needed, before it fully boils.
Kettles are a lot more consistent for water heating than microwaves. Add water, click switch, wait for boil and switch clicking off. I would give good odds I could walk into most people's kitchens and work their kettle without instruction or significant effort.
Kettles can't superheat water.