Asklemmy

44119 readers

1001 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Why Assassin's Creed has lost its identity? (lemm.ee)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Remember those iconic games before 2014? The OG, while dated was really unique for its time, the Ezio Auditore Trilogy that became the standard for the franchise, 3, that was very ambitious (probably too much) with it's setting and story telling. Even 4, although it was the first time AC escaped from the base of what an assassin's creed game is supposed to be.

Unity was the very first big misstep and since then the franchise has become unrecognisable, taking gameplay and mechanics from batman games and now went into unnecessarily long, repetitive and bloated RPGs than the real fans of the series couldn't care less, especially since the core legacy mechanics of parkour and missions were gone. Not only that but they completely threw the modern day story on the trash since Desmond's death...

AC was one of the last original franchises a triple A company gave us and now is just a Witcher wannabe.

"Oh wth are you talking about, it sells well" sales doesn't equal quality. The last games are such a step backwards for the series.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

That doesn't explain throwing all the loved mechanics away. Imagine if CoD just becomes an strategy 3rd person game... Same shit. You don't just shit on your fans just because your previous games were bad. Remember the biggest criticism wasn't the game was the same, the biggest was the lack of polish plus not been an assassin in 4.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

You joke but I would totally come back to CoD if they went 3rd person. Haven’t played since 2011 MW3

[–] Sanctus 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know I am in the minority but if they kept the original gameplay loop, and implemented the multiplayer from Unity a little better, I think it would have gone somewhere better.

If you took a page from Helldiver's 2, with their dungeon master guy, had that guy control the inquisitors, and make all the players assassin's that had goals and missions, and got even more points for being practically ghosts (like an assassin is supposed to be) it might have turned into a fun game. We might feel like we're actually part of a secret organization playing like that with our friends.

Anyway, I liked the multiplayer in Unity, and saw extreme potential in that mixed with the original game loop.

[–] deergon 1 points 6 months ago

Totally agree!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Greed + wanting to appeal to even more normie's.