this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Australian News

551 readers
10 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Although the CSIRO should get all the funding it requires, above some other things we seemingly throw money at. Some of these positions mentioned in the article looking at being reduced aren't science positions...just HR/management related, in that case I have no issues. Lets fund Science not Managers.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If you want scientists to be able to do science, they need support from admin staff doing admin.

About 65% felt the job cuts would impact CSIRO’s ability to put out good research and support Australian industries.

“Less support staff means more work for an already stretched research workforce,” one anonymised respondent wrote.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I work in a large university with a policy of lumping as many administrative duties on the academics as possible.

Why do we want professors coding credit cards to university accounts, managing employment contracts and job listing's, offices for staff, travel bookings ect ect? Is this how we want our tax payer grant money spent?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

100% this. My large university went through a "business improvement program" as a cost cutting exercise, which basically meant cutting heaps of professional (v academic) staff. Now you have academics not trained in a variety of systems wasting a tonne of time trying to use them/do administrative work that a fully trained professional would have been able to do in a fraction of the time, making much greater use of everybody's skills and financial resources.