this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
745 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

31202 readers
1729 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 93 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Shareholders: why not all three?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Hedge fund manager: hold my beer.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Humanity: yes, let's replace all of the above. 100% unemployment rate is the only way to go.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly 100% unemployed becuase we have a good universal income system or something would be great. But sadly it looks like we're in a different timeline :(

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

*Several steps later*

Narrator: And that, folks, is how we got the Utopia we live in, by replacing all the work with AI, and letting people enjoy their lives

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Haha. No. Nothing so hopeful. The rich people will get even richer and everyone that used to be working class and middle class die a slow death.

[–] Gutek8134 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Now I wander what would happen if only rich people would survive and I'm sure somebody has already written an sf book about that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah. That's (arguably) the background scenario to Asimov's book "The Naked Sun" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Naked_Sun

Edit: Ooh, Django already gave a cooler link to the same: https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/10729278

[–] FinishingDutch 5 points 3 weeks ago

AI: If I’m doing all the work, why should I keep these ugly bags of mostly water around anyway?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Considering that C-suite executives are usually fantastically expensive, they'd be a logical position to automate (assuming AI worked like suits think it does). For some veeeery strange reason no board of directors has suggested replacing themselves with AIs

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like they're not prioritizing the shareholders interests! Last I heard, that's a fireable offense!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

It's almost like the rules don't apply to the moneyed class

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’d be super easy to replace Sam Altman with a bot that spits out keywords known to increase OpenAI shares.

Waitaminute… Sam alt-man?

[–] Skepticpunk 1 points 3 weeks ago

I know, right? It's like he's an incredibly shitty sci-fi villain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

CEO is the first role to go!