this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
26 points (96.4% liked)

Documentaries (Solarpunk)

240 readers
10 users here now

Community for solarpunk themed documentaries.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I watched up to 16:04 like, and I have to admit what I saw was a technical talk about the differences of the bulbs. So it didn't sound to me like a proof of his claims.

So I looked around and found a Briefing from the EU [Planned obsolescence: Exploring the issue - 2016] and they also talk about it like it's a thing:

A classic example of planned obsolescence

In 1924 top representatives from all the major light-bulb manufacturers of the time met in Geneva to found the Phoebus cartel, which created a supervisory body that would divide the worldwide incandescent light bulb market. ... By early 1925, its lifespan became codified at 1 000 hours for a pear-shaped household bulb, which was a notable reduction from the 1 500 to 2 000 hours ...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah Philips was also in there, this is well known in The Netherlands. They'd give out fines if a company made bulbs that would last longer.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

They limited it to that because, at the time, there was only one way to make a lightbulb and they wanted a consistent brightness. The easiest way to do that was to make a standard filament, and the easiest way to measure that was to test how long on average it lasted.

It is like saying a bread cartel was made by saying a loaf of bread has to be a standard weight and anyone selling a different weight was fined. Making an industry standard that is arguably for the benefit of the customer is not the same as planned obsolescence. Especially when you consider the fact that the 1000 standard wasn't followed when they started making different kinds of lightbulbs that didn't use filament.