Technology

59692 readers

4774 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

174

Neuralink Can Implant Second Person With a Brain Chip, FDA Says (gizmodo.com)

submitted 6 months ago by 0nekoneko7 to c/technology

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My comment had nothing to do with the article.

You were talking about how we (me and the top level commentor) were both fair in our assumption about what kind of person was that was willing to undergo the procedure. And the article is about people willing to undergo the procedure. So you were absolutely talking about the article. Not only that, but incorrectly claiming that my position was based on being equally as ignorant as you and the top level commentor, when my position was actually based on being knowledgeable by reading the comment.

[–] atrielienz 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because you both made assumptions. Just because your assumptions were not about the article itself doesn't mean that you didn't make assumptions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The assumption you claimed I made was in relation to a fact I stated that's in the article. Wtf are you on about, specifically?

[–] atrielienz 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No. The assumption was that the other person had the context you had from the article, and chose to call someone stupid. But I don't know why you're even bothering with this. You obviously don't agree and that's fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're attempting to change what you accused me of assuming. But in your attempt to be not wrong, you made yourself even more wrong.

I made no assumption that they read the article. I was actually pretty sure they didn't, in typical Lemmy fashion.

So it's not actually you assuming. Lol

And why do you keep on acting like I'm the only one keeping this conversation going? You've responded to me as much as I've responded to you.

[–] atrielienz 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know why you’re even bothering with this

Should have known this was some sort of projection.

[–] atrielienz 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Buddy, just give it up. I don't care that much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Your actions betray your words.