In setting the date for the UK's next general election, prime minister Rishi Sunak this week essentially announced the start of open season for political reporters all hunting for the top scoop of the day by any means necessary. He may need, however, to brief his ministers on basic opsec if he's going to stop any more internal memos from reaching the front pages.
On May 22, less than 24 hours before PM Sunak said July 4 would be the day UK citizens decide on their next leader, The Times published a gem sourced from photos taken of veterans' affairs minister Johnny Mercer's laptop on a public train.
It's an example of shoulder surfing – a type of social engineering technique that involves peering at other people's devices to discover secrets like passwords, PINs, sensitive emails, and the like.
We're not sure what's worse here, the cyber hygiene gaffe and abject failure to protect internal party comms from the prying eyes of the British public traveling from Exeter to London, or the fact that along with his laptop Mercer was papped with his bare feet cheesing out the first-class carriage. For shame, Johnny.
For those whose interests extend beyond the mere cybersecurity aspects of this story, the photos revealed Mercer's memo criticizing Downing Street for giving the PM too much airtime and should instead be offering more public speaking gigs to more popular members of the Conservative party, such as Kemi Badenoch and Penny Mordaunt.
...
Perhaps more illuminating on the current government's attitude towards voting, Mercer also appeared to suggest that the Conservatives were suppressing votes from specific demographics.
His memo states that he was upset that his attempts to let military veterans, who had previously been turned away from polling stations, use their ID cards to prove their identity when voting had been denied. Downing Street special advisers apparently blocked these proposals because it could also "open the floodgates" and allow students to also use their ID cards too.
...
We got in touch with the Cabinet Office to ask for comment and find out if ministers are briefed on the dangers of shoulder surfing, but it hadn't responded by the time of publication.
While we wait for a response from the UK gov, we can instead turn to Mercer's X account, which is where he responded to The Times' scoop by calling the public transport snapper a "little weirdo."
"So some little weirdo has gone round snapping my laptop reading private messages from a private email account," Mercer Xeeted. "My shoes and socks were off because I'd just cycled across Dartmoor in the rain.
"Shoot me now. Or grow up."
UK Politics
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
view the rest of the comments
They are allowed to vote, but everybody now has to present a valid form of id when casting their vote.
The issue is there's some kind of veteran card that's not considered a valid form of id for things like this. In the same way that student id cards aren't valid.
Sure as hell sounds like voter suppression to me!
Yet I’ll bet some random Home Counties bowling club taxi-discount members card blurry photocopy is high on the list of ‘acceptables’.
It's not. They are largely sticking to the generally accepted official forms of ID - allowing military veterans to use their ID (which can currently only be used in specific contexts) would have opened the door to a whole range of other IDs, which is why this was all shut down.
So I had understood that from the publicity, basically passport, driving licence, or their special new national ID that's definitely not a National Identity Card.
However, the list now includes lots of documents that only pensioners have, senior bus passes and 60+ rail cards etc. Since when was a buss pass a valid form of ID? It's very weird.
https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/voting-and-elections/voter-id/accepted-forms-photo-id
Disabled bus passes as well.
And because anyone with these photo id bus passes has proven their identity to local government. In much the same way the voter id card will be confirmed. So why waste money checking again
Likely also they less likely to have a driving licence. So it helps reduce prejudice against those unable to drive. But that really dosent sound very tory.
Why would pensioners be less likely to have a driving licence?
Also it's pretty clear tories are targetting their voters as no other bus passes are included or basically any IDs that would predominantly be carried by younger people.
Because at 70 they are required to renew every few years. Stating they have no issues effecting health.
The older you get the more likely you are to have health ans eye issues that prevent you driving.
So firstly, you self declare so no check, secondly, an out of date licence is fine. Most people by retirement age will have driven.
retirement is 65 to 90 or more. The number of people living past 90 has increased hugly over the last few generations. 100 is still rare but far from unheard of.
So yes a sizable number of retired voters will no longer be safe to drive.
As for you self declare. Yeah that is nopt a good thing. And way less then 100%. For some conditions your doctor is required to notify the DVLA. As are police officers if you are4 stopped and they feel your mental or physical state means you are unsafe to drive.
At that point you are required to get a doctor to confirm your medical condition is not a threat.
And dude sorry to tell you this. When your parents or grandparents get to the age where they are unsafe to drive.
It is your moral and sociatal duty to convince them to declare.
This is why my mother is no longer driving.
(Males in my family have a genetic condition. That means we lose vision in our 40s or before. So my dad and myself were both stopped by the doctor informing us then reporting to the DVLA the condition had gotten that bad. Dad many years before me)
And my parents discouraged my grandad on my mothers side at 75 as parkinsons started to show.
honestly once you reach retirement age their are many many things that can happen. Many you will survive but will leave you unable to respond safely in an accident. And the vast majority of families do encourage them to declare.
Police unfortunatly are far to often only involved in an accident or near accident.
Ill also add. I lost my cancelled licence within a few years wallets go missing and in my case stolen. Most no longer able to drive have no ability to replace a lost licence.
And the main point I mentioned. Its aqlso about efficency. The same local authority issuing retired bus passes and disabled bus passes are prooving the ID and disability when doing so.
Why the hell would you requiore them to do it a second time just so the folks can vote once their licence is no longer valid. I mean the tories are hardly funding extrastaff for local authorities to handle it.