this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
933 points (99.6% liked)

TechTakes

1441 readers
160 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source

I see Google's deal with Reddit is going just great...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i understand the spirit, but putting out harmful disinformation is not a good method to combat the large language model land grab we're seeing right now.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If it is considered harmful because people are referencing internet forum comments for treatments for disease then I do not consider myself responsible for the harm.

If people can't understand what anecdotal information is and it kills them, then it's Darwinism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's not darwinism, what you're playing with is casual eugenics (you clearly don't value life of certain – arbitrarily chosen – people, and are fine with them suffering harm); don't. there's nothing good waiting for you on that path.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

this is you:

I’ll usually debate people as well, but not those who resort to a logic fallacy as boring as ad hominem for lack of an argument. Seeya.

we don’t need your debatebro ass here. though now that the flood of random posters is mostly over, we also don’t need more gravely unfunny lol monkeyspork random reddit posts either

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

…and i told that person that nothing good is waiting on that path.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

i don't understand the question – are you asking what makes arbitrary the rule “people who suffered harm because they followed an advice on the internet do not deserve to survive” ?