this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
515 points (91.1% liked)

Comics

5826 readers
8 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildcardology 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The quidditch world cup in book 4 happened this way. The Irish won by points but they did not catch the snitch.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And there was a point in... 3, I think, where Harry was instructed to delay catching the snitch until they were at least 50 points up because they wouldn't have enough league points or something to progress if he didn't.

[–] wildcardology 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

In the 1st movie, Oliver woods mistakenly said that if Harry catches the snitch they win I think that's where all the confusion comes from.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean in the books the matches typically score somewhere of 5-10 goals per team until Harry catches the snitch. So it is pretty much the catcher of the snitch gets to win the game.

Maybe we can give the benefit of the doubt that snitches used to be harder to catch before brooms became crazy fast and agile like the Nimbus and Firebolt series. It is mentioned that there were matches lasting for days, but in the book conveniently the matches never seem to last more than two hours or so.

[–] wildcardology 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the snitch was nerfed for school matches?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Could be, we know from 7 that they're bespoke for every match for catch dispute reasons, the artisans could probably tweak them to match a school league. That said, I don't believe Rowling put this much thought into it.

[–] Quetzalcutlass 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It should be noted the Irish team had the best catchers in the League, while the Bulgarian team was mediocre and carried by their seeker. And even then the Bulgarians only lost by a tiny bit.

If Rowling's goal was to show that other positions mattered, she chose a terrible way to do it. You'd have to be more than fifteen goals ahead in a game that often ends before a team scores fifteen goals, period.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

And notably, the odds for this happening were extremely low, because the vast majority of the time the team that catches the snitch wins