this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
128 points (98.5% liked)

Forgotten Weapons

1506 readers
24 users here now

This is a community dedicated to discussion around historical arms, mechanically unique arms, and Ian McCollum's Forgotten Weapons content. Posts requesting an identification of a particular gun (or other arm) are welcome.

https://www.youtube.com/@ForgottenWeapons

https://www.forgottenweapons.com/

Rules:

1) Treat Others in a Civil Manner. This is not the place to deride others for their race, sexuality, or etc. Personal insults of other members are not welcome here. Neither are calls for violence.

2) No Contemporary Politics Historical politics that influenced designs or adoption of designs are excluded from this rule. Acknowledgement of existing laws to explain designs is also permissable, so long as comments aren't in made to advocate or oppose a policy. Let's not make this a place where we battle over which color ties our politicians should have, or the issues of today.

3) No Advertising This doesn't apply to posting historical advertisements.

4) Keep Post on Topic This rule will be enforced with leeway. Just keep it related to arms or Forgotten Weapons. If you feel you have something that's worth posting here that isn't about either of those (and doesn't violate other rules) feel free to reach out to a mod.

5) No NSFW Content Please refrain from posting uncensored extreme gore or sexualized content. If censored these posts may be fine.

Post Guide Lines

These are suggestions not rules.

-Provide a duration for videos. eg. [12:34]

-Provide a year to either indicate when a specific design was produced, patented, or released. If you have an older design being used in a recent conflict provide the year the picture was taken. Dates should be included to help contextualize, not necessarily give exact periods.

-Post a full URL, on mobile devices it can be hard to tell what you're clicking on if you only see "(Link)".

-Posts do not have to be just firearms. Blades, bows, etc. are also welcome.

Adjacent Communities

If you run a community that you feel might fit in dm a mod and we might add your's.

Want to Find a Museum Near You? Check out the mega thread: https://lemmy.world/post/9699481

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Top picture is silver medalist Thomas Paine from the 1896 Summer games, the first year with a shooting competition. Bottom is gold medalist Vitalina Batsarashkina from the 2020 games.

https://www.ssusa.org/content/athens-1896-olympics-the-first-shots-for-record/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If I recall correctly, it doesn’t actually work by just holding the trigger and fanning the hammer. You actually have to fan the hammer and pull the trigger every time to get the cylinder to revolve to the next shot. I recall an episode of Mythbusters where a guy could do it so fast that it looked like the Hollywood version, but he was still having to pull the trigger for each shot.

There may be competition guns that allow for the Hollywood fan, but I’ve never seen or heard of one in real life.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So, this level of technicality comes down to specific SA revolvers. I have not seen this MythBusters episode, but to the best of my knowledge, both today and 150 years ago, some SA revolvers function as you say where a trigger pull is needed each time, and some basically do not.

As a kind of example, I used to have some kind of 50s era Ruger SA revolver in .22lr.

Now I never actually tried fanning at a range, (can you imagine most places will ban you instantly for this as its generally extremely inaccurate lol?) but with the cylinder unloaded and completely clear... basically, if you pulled the hammer back, pulled the trigger, click, hammer fires, or would have fired.

But then, if you pull the trigger back just a bit more, then I could work the hammer with my other hand. While pulling back the hammer, as the cylinder rotates, the trigger fights back and wants to reset just a bit, but once the cylinder is lined up, the trigger has reset, and i am still pulling on it, and click it 'fires' again.

So... its not really pulling the trigger separately for each shot, its more like pulling it firmly, and while you work the hammer, the trigger pushes back a bit, but if you keep the same grip, it does just fire again.

I am aware from researching online and asking old timers that this level of action manipulation varied amongst SA revolvers of old.

With some SA revolvers the trigger reset is much more pronounced such that as you say, its pretty much a totally new pull of the trigger each time.

Either way, in the real west, fanning, while possible to do with some pistols, was extremely uncommon in basically anything other than showy demonstrations..

However, Ruger now makes a model called the Vaquero, which is specifically designed for the fanning competitions I mentioned earlier.

And given that these competitions have been around for at least a decade before than thing hit the market, I would be willing to bet that other SA revolvers could properly fan, maybe you might have had to get a bit of a custom trigger job or something though.

Edit: Fun possible fact, I am fairly, though not totally sure that the term 'hair trigger' actually comes from these kinds of SA revolvers that either naturally or via tinkering had such a small give and reset that it was said to be the miniscule distance of a literal hair, and thus more easily allowed rapid fanning.

Though as with many gun related aphorisms, that origination of the phrase may be debated/apocryphal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for the detailed reply! I learned things today.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Please attend tomorrow's lecture:

Yes, the Mateba sure looks cool, but you will likely never own one.

Lol, long story short, Togusa's famous Mateba Unica 6 auto revolver was basically an experimental design, few were/are made, they're absurdly expensive, and because it is such an uncommon design (a semi auto revolver, meaning that the recoil actually sets up the next round to be fired instead of the long Double Action trigger pull of most modern revolvers), that anyone who owns one will prefer to never sell it.

However, we do now have the Chiappa Rhino, which are fairly easily obtainable and were designed by the designer of the Unica 6, and share the Unica 6's firing from the bottom of the cylinder. While they have a very fancy hammer mechanism compared to most other revolvers, unfortunately they are not semi automatic =(

[–] Anticorp 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're incorrect. You can just hold the trigger and fan the hammer.

Source: have done it a bunch of times with several different single action only revolvers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Strange, doesn’t work with mine.

[–] Anticorp 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it a single action only pistol? It doesn't work with double action pistols.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That explains it. Thanks!