Asklemmy

44151 readers

1539 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

535

Would you support a mandatory retirement age of 75 for US House, US Senate & US Supreme Court Justices and if not why? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 7 months ago by robocall to c/[email protected]

174 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but agree with most of the other comments here. It should be lowered to 65-67 instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

60 for retirement, but allowed to sub contact into the party as advisor positions as staff and encouraged to. But no on the floor decision making positions.

[–] teamevil 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

65-67 is perfect.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

65-67=-2

An innovative idea, but difficult to implement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

😆

I’m in favor of “recall ‘em all”, this rule change could be just the ticket!