Technology

59581 readers

6141 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

367

NetBSD bans all commits of AI-generated code (mastodon.sdf.org)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New development policy: code generated by a large language model or similar technology (e.g. ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot) is presumed to be tainted (i.e. of unclear copyright, not fitting NetBSD's licensing goals) and cannot be committed to NetBSD.

https://www.NetBSD.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Terces 112 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How do they know that you wrote it yourself and didn't just steal it?

This is a rule to protect themselves. If there is ever a case around this, they can push the blame to the person that committed the code for breaking that rule.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is the only reason rules exist, not to stop people doing a thing but to be able to enforce or defect responsibility when they do.

[–] ripcord 7 points 6 months ago

I mean, generally rules at least are to strongly discourage people from doing a thing, or to lead to things that WOULD prevent people from doing a thing.

A purely conceptual rule by itself would not magically stop someone from doing a thing, but that's kind of a weird way to think about it.