this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
3643 points (98.5% liked)

Fediverse

28564 readers
380 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joerocca 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

I'm on the fence here. Luckily, at least, I think community/subreddit-based sites like Lemmy/Reddit don't have "network effects" that are as "sticky" as Mastodon/Twitter, because with Lemmy/Reddit you don't need to build up a follower list to start getting value. You just join the community and it's as if you immediately "followed" a bunch of people who share your interests. You don't even need to make an account - you can just bookmark a community and lurk, and maybe you eventually make an account to start interacting. It's a great "on-ramp" - very low barrier to entry/usefulness.

I think that's why Lemmy was able to take off so fast. It relies on community-level coordination, rather than every individual user having to make their own choice to switch, and try to get all their followers/followees to switch. So even if Meta did add a community-style mode, I don't think it'd eat into the Lemmy userbase. It is hard to be sure though, and I respect the choices of those instances that have blocked/defederated.

Mastodon admins have a harder decision to make I think - there's an opportunity to get very quick growth by effectively adding a lot more followable users/content. A bunch of people don't like Meta/Facebook, but want to follow their friends, and so they may use Mastodon to do that, which could get a lot more people to move to "real" fediverse apps/sites like Mastodon. I know a lot of people that are on Threads now, and I'm looking forward to being able to follow them from Mastodon, rather than being forced to get Threads to keep up to date with what they're working on.

[–] Tigerfishy 19 points 1 year ago (8 children)

No fences up my ass here, I didn't jump so quickly to lemmy to be immediately joined to fucken Facebook. Like. At all. I'd bet a quick poll would speak loudly

[–] required 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hate to say this opinion would be minority even on Lemmy. People value convenience over anything else

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dont think you've taken into account what people in lemmy value the most.

Their principles. They mostly joined lemmy because one of their principle is against big corp controlling us for their own purpose.

That's why threads is being blocked preemptively. Because they are corpo. Now compare that to exploding heads instance. The slowness of blocking another instance because of hate speech and bigotry. It's because exploding heads issue does not or barely touched most lemmy peoples principle trigger. They allowed it to exist first for a long time before even considering of blocking it

[–] unerds 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

for real, i'm not here because of convenience. it's pretty inconvenient, actually.

i willingly give enough away to corporate overlords as it is... this is one of the occasions where i choose to not... despite the inconvenience.

[–] Aux -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Defeding breaks Fediverse principles. People who want to defed meta don't belong here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I tagged you as "meta shill". Now whenever I see your post I'll know you work for meta.

Thanks for revealing yourself.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot 2 points 1 year ago

even Lemmy

Do you even hear yourself? You're commenting this over a post on the second biggest instance banning Threads?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)