onlyvideos

Katie speaks to Jeremy Loffredo, an investigative journalist and filmmaker back from Israel where he filmed Israelis admitting to war crimes and calling for genocide.

Timestamps:

• 00:00 Intro
• 2:23 How did Jeremy begin documenting the genocide in Gaza
• 4:03 Israeli Settlers BLOCK AID to Gaza
• 9:04 Jeremy's history with Israel
• 12:24 People are calling for the GENOCIDE of Palestinians in NYC
• 15:40 Americans are going to Israel to block aid to Gaza
• 17:32 Israeli ADMITS to committing war crimes
• 20:24 The things Jeremy WASN'T able to catch on camera
• 23:40 The indoctrination of Zionism
• 26:54 Are there pro-Palestinian Israelis?
• 30:54 Israeli's think Netanyahu is TOO soft on Palestinians
• 33:06 Jeremy's work in the West Bank
• 37:34 Jeremy's experience with Palestinians
• 42:13 Why the protests in Israel have stopped
• 49:20 Israeli settlers after a hard days work of blocking aid to Gaza
• 49:54 The 'Ban' Jeremy experienced
• 53:22 Jeremy's history with Zionism
• 53:57 Palestinians speak on the occupation

Jeremy Loffredo is an investigative journalist and filmmaker based in New York. He has spent the past few months documenting the explosion of settler violence in the West Bank and the increase of political and religious repression against Palestinians in occupied Jerusalem. Most recently, Loffredo spent time within the ranks of the Jewish Israeli nationalists invading Gaza to establish Jewish settlements and blocking humanitarian aid for starving Palestinians at the Gaza border. The Israelis admitted to war crimes and clamored for genocide.

Robby Soave and Niall Stanage discuss Ronna McDaniel's ousting from NBC.

Short Summary

1. NBC faced backlash from on-air talent for hiring Ron McDaniel, the former RNC chairwoman.
2. Chuck Todd, Joe Scarborough, and Rachel Maddow criticized the decision.
3. NBC ended its relationship with McDaniel after staff outrage.
4. Rachel Maddow expressed disbelief at McDaniel being on the payroll.
5. The quick reversal by NBC was seen as cowardly and embarrassing.
6. Debate centered around Republican voices on air versus hiring someone complicit in attempts to overturn an election.
7. Lack of diverse perspectives on cable news networks like MSNBC was highlighted.
8. Fox News often features Democrats or liberals critical of their own party.
9. Criticism of handling a staff revolt related to a controversial figure and balancing reaching different audiences against election lies.
10. Discussion on the financial implications of the situation and the embarrassment due to poor decision-making.

delivering to you the towering and sterling efforts of Britain's most outstanding political figure. Straight forward. Straight talking.

Edit:

• removed LIVE info, added time length

Timestamps:

• [5:38] George starts
• [11:22] Mass Murder in Moscow
• [25:51] Audience Question: Is the US guilty of war crimes by continuing to arm Israel?
• [27:28] Call in number, Question results update
• [29:43] Guest Prof. David Miller, Producer 'Palestine Declassified' & Author
• [43:28] Taking calls from audience
• [1:09:02] Guest Rachel Blevins Journalist & Political Commentator
• [1:23:00] Break: H. G. Wells, The War of the Worlds, short audio clip reading of book
• [1:24:13] Question results update and taking calls from audience
• [1:32:06] Guest Scott Ritter, Former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer
• [1:51:39] Question Results
• [1:52:19] Taking a call from audience, Topic: Moscow
• [1:54:10] Taking a call from audience, Topic: Princess Catherine's video
• [1:57:37] Hayatri Galloway, MOATS Social Media News Update
• [2:01:40] Last call from audience, Topic: Palestine

Join this livestream reacting to the terror inflicted on Moscow and what it means in the world of geopolitics.

Edit:

• removed LIVE info, added video length, added timestamped url to start at 4:28, added some timestamps
• updated title with timestamps

Timestamps:

• [9:25] Moscow Attack
• [16:11] Putin Responds to Moscow Attack
• [20:14] Scott Ritter on CIA's Crocus Connection
• [1:09:55] Russia Declares War
• [1:38:53] Few Announcements
• [1:43:52] Super chat comments

Candace Owens and The Daily Wire have parted ways. My reaction while speaking to George Galloway.

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses how the issue of Israel and Palestine is creating divisions in political commentator spaces in America.
2. Certain figures like Steven Crowder, Ben Shapiro, and Tucker Carlson have taken stances on the conflict, leading to rifts within the media landscape.
3. The speaker highlights censorship surrounding discussions on Palestine and suggests that finding common ground on free speech is crucial for progress.
4. Some elements on the right are starting to challenge the prevailing orthodoxy on Israel and Palestine.
5. The importance of defending each other's rights to speak freely as a precondition for making progress is emphasized.
6. The speaker discusses the importance of having a balanced approach to migration controls to prevent interventions in nations from which migrants come.
7. Managing borders sensibly is crucial to protect the interests of the working class and prevent labor exploitation.
8. Criticism of negative connotations associated with leftism and liberalism is made, advocating for a focus on national interests and supporting the working class of all colors.
9. The role of war in driving mass immigration and refugee flows is highlighted, suggesting that investing in developing countries could reduce the need for people to leave their homelands.
10. The speaker expresses a desire for an alliance between different groups to promote autonomy and representation, touching on the conflict in Gaza and challenges of free speech within ideological differences.

Short Summary

1. Candace Owens is a popular political commentator in the United States who works for the right-wing website, The Daily Wire, founded by Ben Shapiro and Jeremy Boreing in 2015, ["with investment of a right-wing billionaire that gave them tens of millions, if not more, of startup cash"].
2. The Daily Wire gained success, especially on Facebook, due to aggressive promotion by the algorithm.
3. The website [claims it] promotes free speech, opposes cancel culture, and values engaging in debate.
4. Tensions arose within the organization over disagreements, particularly regarding Israel.
5. Ben Shapiro strongly supports Israel due to personal ties and beliefs, while Candace Owens began questioning US support for Israel's actions in Gaza and its financial backing by the US.
6. Criticism of Israel within the organization and the broader right-wing community often faces accusations of anti-Semitism.
7. Owens faced pressure and accusations from organizations like the ADL and individuals like Rabbi Schully for her views on Israel.
8. The video transcript discusses accusations of anti-Semitism against Candace Owens and her views on Israel, leading to the end of her relationship with The Daily Wire.
9. Jeremy Boreing, CEO of The Daily Wire, stated that Owens' advocacy on Israel crossed the line of racism, leading to their decision to part ways.
10. The video criticizes those who called out Owens for using tactics they claim to oppose, such as censorship and deplatforming, while supporting such actions when defending Israel.

Economist Richard Wolff discusses how Russia's successful defeat of NATO sanctions not only saved its economy but also fueled the rise of another: China. This video breaks down how the US-NATO empire is crumbling, and fast.

edit:

• fixed word error on title

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses the changing world economy and the impact of geopolitical events on global trade dynamics.
2. Russia's response to sanctions from Europe led to China becoming the largest exporter of automobiles in the world.
3. Russia stopped buying European automobiles and instead made a deal with China for oil and gas, resulting in increased Chinese automobile purchases in Russia.
4. The shift in the automotive industry exemplifies modern economic development, with China benefiting as the largest exporter of automobiles.
5. President Trump's trade policies towards China resulted in supply chain disruptions and increased costs for American companies.
6. China's economic growth rate of 5.2% is higher than the celebrated 3.2% growth rate in the West.
7. The speaker suggests that China's investments in high-tech and clean energy, as well as their involvement in global initiatives like BRICS, position them as a potential global leader.
8. The video highlights the shift in global power dynamics from the West to the East, with China emerging as a significant player.
9. The speaker emphasizes the need for the West to adapt to the changing landscape and engage with China as a rising power rather than resist their ascent.

Journalist Jeremy Loffredo goes inside the grassroots Israeli campaign to block desperately needed aid to the besieged Gaza Strip and elicits the shockingly candid views of the Jewish Israeli nationalists manning the barricades.

Setting out on a bus caravan through illegal Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, Loffredo arrives at the Kerem Shalom crossing to Gaza, filming Israeli citizens as they physically block trucks loaded with flour and other essential goods. There, a reservist who served in the military assault on Gaza confesses to an array of war crimes, including blowing up the offices of UN centers dedicated to providing food to the local population.

Loffredo then joins nationalists on a march toward Gaza, where they hope to establish new settlements after the population is violently driven out.

Short Summary

1. Israeli nationalists are blocking humanitarian aid trucks from delivering food to Palestinians in Gaza, believing it all goes to Hamas.
2. Israeli military and police support these actions, allowing settlers to block aid crossings and even attempt to breach the Egyptian border without consequences.
3. Settlers bring their families, including babies and handicapped individuals, to participate in the blockade.
4. They express a lack of trust in Palestinians and a desire for them to leave Gaza.
5. Settlers are involved in military operations in Gaza, destroying houses and tunnels.
6. Despite their illegal actions, settlers are not arrested or held accountable by the authorities.
7. The video discusses a group of Israelis expressing a desire to depopulate Gaza and transform it into a Jewish-exclusive beachfront region.
8. They believe Israelis should be able to live in Gaza as part of their sovereign state.
9. Plans are mentioned to build settlements and towns in different parts of Gaza, emphasizing the importance of not leaving Gaza without a Jewish presence.
10. Israelis attempted to enter Gaza but were stopped by the military, constructing symbolic wooden outposts before being removed for their safety.

We are back LIVE to cover Vladimir Putin's resounding victory in the latest Russian presidential election and NATO's colossal defeat at the hands of the rising power. Also, Israel plans on extending its brutal war but Yemen and other regional forces have declared a war of their own of a much different kind. All this and more in a jam-packed geopolitics livestream!

Edit:

• removed LIVE info, added video length, added some timestamps

Timestamps (TBD):

• [3:32] Danny starts
• [5:11] Overview of segments
• [6:57] Yemen's Red Sea Game Changer
• [33:55] Putin Warns NATO/Scott Ritter on Russia's Next Move
• [1:04:03] US Green Berets inTaiwan, US and China
• [1:34:57] Announcements on upcoming shows
• [1:39:16] Super chat comments

Short Summary

1. Candace Owens, a conservative voice, has become a leading dissenter on the issue of Israel and US support for it.
2. Owens questions why American citizens should finance Israel's military and criticizes the lack of accountability for Israel's actions.
3. Her dissent has caused tension within conservative circles, with some calling for her to be fired for allegedly cultivating an anti-semitic following.
4. Owens highlights the tactic of labeling critics of Israel as racists or anti-semites, used by pro-Israel conservatives to shut down debate.
5. She criticizes Israel's actions, calling its war in Gaza a genocide, sparking controversy but raising valid points about the need for open discussion and accountability in US support for Israel.
6. Owens faces backlash for her views on Israel, engaging in a heated dialogue defending her stance while condemning terrorism and violence.
7. The discussion also touches on the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the moral implications of violence committed by both sides.
8. Owens is accused of not condemning Hamas strongly enough, leading to a debate on the severity of their actions and the limitations imposed on discussing and criticizing Israel.
9. The speaker points out the hypocrisy of some American conservatives who advocate for free speech but silence those critical of Israel, using Candace Owens as an example.
10. Some conservatives resort to the same tactics they criticize in their political opponents when it comes to defending Israel.

Briahna Joy Gray and Robby Soave discuss the impact of the Israel-Hamas war on the death of journalists.

Short Summary

1. The video discusses the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, focusing on the alarming number of journalists killed in the region, particularly Palestinian journalists.
2. It mentions a specific incident at [Al-Shifa] Hospital in Northern Gaza where journalists and health workers were mistreated by the IDF.
3. The State Department was questioned about the US response to attacks on journalists, with a call for stronger action to protect journalists in conflict zones like Gaza.
4. The video concludes with a critical analysis of the US government's handling of the situation, suggesting a lack of meaningful action to hold Israel accountable for violations of international humanitarian law.
5. The speaker expresses concern about a journalist being treated like a criminal by the Israeli government, despite Israel being described as the only democracy in the region and a close ally.
6. Emphasizing that journalists should not have special rights but all individuals should be treated fairly and not detained without suspicion of a crime.
7. The video also discusses US Secretary of State Antony Blinken's efforts to push for a ceasefire in Gaza, highlighting the uncertainty around whether the ceasefire would be permanent or just a temporary pause in the conflict.
8. The effectiveness of temporary ceasefires in providing relief to the people of Gaza, especially considering the ongoing humanitarian crisis in the region, is questioned.
9. Criticism is directed at the State Department for claiming to push for a ceasefire at the UN while previously blocking two ceasefire deals, suggesting the Biden Administration's change in attitude may be due to shifting domestic political calculations.
10. The speaker views the ceasefire announcement as more of a messaging spectacle rather than a substantive shift, promising updates on Secretary [Blinken]'s new ceasefire plan and inviting viewers to stay tuned for more information.

Short Summary

1. The video segment discusses the government's relationship with Big Tech and censorship issues.
2. Independent journalist Matt Taibbi expresses disappointment with the Supreme Court's handling of the case.
3. Taibbi highlights the difference in perception between lower court judges critical of government actions and Supreme Court justices more accepting of government influence on Big Tech.
4. Taibbi emphasizes the coercive nature of the government's communication with tech companies and criticizes the Supreme Court's lack of skepticism towards the government's intentions.
5. The video transcript discusses communications between the highest levels of Twitter and the government, highlighting government pressure on third-party platforms like Facebook and Google to censor American citizens.
6. The conversation delves into potential government involvement in regulating online content, such as creating a department of misinformation or coercing tech companies in response to government requests.
7. The speaker criticizes the New York Times for misrepresenting reporting on Twitter files and accuses them of promoting government censorship.
8. The discussion then shifts to the perception of free speech as a polarizing issue, with some viewing it as pro or anti-Trump.
9. The speaker discusses how some individuals and media outlets are willing to sacrifice First Amendment free speech principles to oppose Donald Trump.
10. The conversation emphasizes the importance of values over political labels and the need to challenge establishment control of information dissemination.

Journalist Matt Taibbi weighs in on free speech being on the balance in the Supreme Court.

Edit:

• fixed format error with summary
• fixed misspelled name on point 2 of summary

Short Summary

1. During a Supreme Court oral argument for the case of [Murthy] v. Missouri, the issue of whether the First Amendment restricts the government from censoring speech was discussed.
2. Liberal Justice [Ketanji] Brown Jackson expressed concerns that the First Amendment limits government actions during critical times and questioned what actions the government should take to protect citizens.
3. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito raised concerns about government officials controlling media content and mentioned Section 230 and antitrust laws.
4. Journalist Matt [Taibbi] discussed the case and highlighted the importance of the First Amendment in preventing the government from suppressing dissenting opinions.
5. The discussion also touched on the pressure the government exerted on social media companies to censor content, referencing the National Rifle Association case and the government's direct coercion tactics.
6. The case involves the Biden Administration's efforts to pressure social media companies to remove content deemed false.
7. Various instances were discussed where government officials, including the White House Press Secretary and the Surgeon General, called for regulatory measures in response to misinformation.
8. The conversation also mentioned using Section 230 to hold companies accountable and described internal correspondence at Twitter regarding regulatory changes.
9. The government's public threats towards companies are seen as a strong message to both companies and the public.
10. The speaker emphasizes the difference between public pressure and regulatory threats, highlighting the inappropriate nature of private threats coupled with requests.

Short Summary

1. The video segment starts with a morning show introduction where the hosts discuss their weekend activities and a comedian's jokes about changing seasons.
2. The hosts mention upcoming news topics, including Nancy Pelosi defending Chuck Schumer's comments, cease-fire negotiations in Doha, and Tucker Carlson's alleged photo editing.
3. The focus shifts to former President Donald Trump's recent speech at a campaign rally in Ohio, where he made controversial remarks about imposing tariffs on cars and a potential "bloodbath."
4. Liberals and conservatives had differing interpretations of Trump's comments, with some defending his statements as referring to China's manufacturing plans.
5. Elon Musk and Sean Parnell criticized NBC for their coverage of the speech.
6. Nancy Pelosi condemned Trump's remarks and questioned his trustworthiness with intelligence information.
7. The hosts discuss the media's portrayal of Trump's comments and the need for unbiased reporting on substantive issues.
8. Criticism is directed towards sensationalizing and misrepresenting Trump's words to stoke fear and distrust.
9. Instances where Trump made controversial remarks, like comparing himself to Kim Jong-un, are highlighted to emphasize the importance of fair and accurate reporting without sensationalism.
10. Biased reporting is argued to contribute to a lack of trust in the media and could lead to a repetition of divisive coverage seen in the 2016 election.

Due Dissidence is a multimedia one-stop shop for left politics and gallows humor in written, audio, and video form.

Edit:

• removed LIVE info, updated yt link to start at &t=678 (11:18), timestamps added

On this stream: Norman Finkelstein roasts Destiny in raucous debate - Chuck Schumer calls for Netanyahu's removal from office - Bill Maher outdoes himself with most out-of-touch monologue of the year so far - and more.

Timestamps:

• [15:16] Trump Bloodbath
• [42:55] Maher Says America Already Great
• [1:23:09] Finkelstein's Rendezvous With Destiny
• [1:45:31] Schumer Turns on Netanyahu
• [2:05:55] St. Patrick's Day Statement, Great Irish Famine historians talk about Gaza

Welcome to the official George Galloway channel: delivering to you the towering and sterling efforts of Britain’s most outstanding political figure. Straight forward. Straight talking.

Edit:

• update uptime to 33min, timestamp section added with (TBD)
• updated uptime to 78min, added timestamp info
• removed LIVE info, added video length, updated link to start at 5:38

Timestamps(TBD):

• [7:38] St Patrick's Day/Biden/Putin/France/Macron
• [29:56] Interview of Dr. Mustafa Barghouti Palestinian MP, Leader 'Palestinian National Initiative'
• [1:12:09] Interview Hekmat Aboukhater, Contributor 'The Grayzone' & 'Mint Press'
• [1:57:30] Gayatri Galloway, MOATS Social Media News Update

What we aren't taught about the Black Panther Party.

On December 4th, 1969, the Black Panther Party’s Illinois Chairman Fred Hampton was murdered by police. But his story is about much more than the raid that took his life. The movement Hampton helped create was unique, and revolutionary.

In the late 1960s, Fred Hampton helped lead a coalition of activists, working across racial lines against a corrupt city government that threatened their communities. At the core of their work were social programs, including free breakfasts, health clinics, and legal aid. Hampton named the group the Rainbow Coalition. And because of their impact, it wasn’t long before they got the attention of the police and the FBI. What followed was an assassination, and a coverup.

Edit:

• fixing url link, thumnail
• reverted to shorten url

Short Summary

1. Speaker discusses the manipulation of African Americans in American politics by white liberals and conservatives.
2. White liberals are criticized for being deceitful and hypocritical, pretending to be friends with African Americans while using them for political gain.
3. White conservatives also seek power but in a different manner.
4. The speaker highlights the divide between middle-class African Americans who support integration and the majority who do not vote and reject the current leadership chosen for them by white society.
5. The speaker calls for understanding the needs and desires of the black masses to solve the race problem in America.

The anniversary of The March On Washington was 60 years ago, here's what Malcolm X said about it in 1963.

Short Summary

1. White men used tactics against the Black Revolution, such as using big guns or Negro leaders to suppress it.
2. Black leaders like Martin Luther King faced financial troubles and loss of influence due to failed desegregation efforts.
3. Grassroots local leaders began stirring up unrest and protests among the masses.
4. Internal conflicts arose among national statured Negro civil rights leaders, weakening control over the masses.
5. The Black Revolution gained momentum with protests erupting in cities like Birmingham, leading to Kennedy addressing civil rights as a moral issue and proposing a Civil Rights bill.
6. The grassroots movement scared the white power structure, prompting Kennedy to intervene and endorse the movement.
7. A council for United civil rights leadership was formed, causing internal strife among civil rights leaders.
8. White men manipulated and took control of the March on Washington, elevating "big six" leaders who were not originally part of the march.
9. Prominent figures like Walter Reuther were invited to dilute the march's message and make it less militant.
10. The event was described as a circus, with leaders being controlled on what to say and do, turning the march into a performance rather than a genuine protest. Leaders were accused of being sellouts and acting under the influence of white organizers, likened to a scripted Hollywood performance.

President John F. Kennedy addressed the nation in 1962 during the Cuban Missile Crisis, igniting an embargo that would last more than 50 years.

Edit:

• added summary

Short Summary

1. President John F. Kennedy addressed the nation on October 22, 1962, revealing the presence of offensive missile sites in Cuba established by the Soviet Union.
2. The missile sites included medium-range ballistic missiles capable of reaching major cities in the Western Hemisphere, posing a direct threat to the United States and its allies.
3. Kennedy emphasized that the presence of these weapons in Cuba violated international agreements and posed a significant danger to global peace and security.
4. He criticized the Soviet Union for deceptive statements regarding the defensive nature of the weapons in Cuba and highlighted the risk of nuclear conflict in the face of such aggressive actions.
5. Kennedy underscored the need for the US to respond decisively to protect the nation and its allies from the looming threat of nuclear war.
6. The speaker addressed the deployment of strategic weapons outside of Soviet soil, specifically in Cuba, emphasizing that this act was provocative and unjustified.
7. They announced a quarantine on offensive military equipment bound for Cuba, increased surveillance, and reinforcement of military bases.
8. The speaker warned that any nuclear missile launch from Cuba would be considered an attack requiring a full retaliatory response.
9. They called for international action through the Organization of American States and the United Nations to address the Soviet threat and urged Chairman Khrushchev to eliminate the weapons in Cuba and work towards peaceful solutions.
10. The speaker expressed willingness to engage in discussions for disarmament and peaceful resolutions but also stressed readiness to respond decisively to any hostile actions anywhere in the world.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13162438

That Mexican OT is a Billboard Hot 100 charting rapper originally hailing from Bay City, Texas.

Ameshia Cross and Amber Duke discuss Democrats' plans against third-parties.

Short Summary

1. The Democratic National Committee's efforts to coordinate attacks on third-party and independent presidential candidates.
2. Concerns that a third-party ticket could splinter the base and potentially lead to Donald Trump winning a second term.
3. Discussion on uncommitted voters, particularly in Michigan, who are hesitant to support Biden due to concerns about his stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
4. Potential impact of third-party candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Cornell West on the political landscape and differing views within the Democratic party regarding support for Israel.
5. Contrasts between Republicans and Democrats on women's reproductive rights and President Biden's evolving stance on Israel, especially in relation to civilian casualties in the conflict with Gaza.
6. Criticism of the No Labels initiative as a vanity project and questioning its effectiveness in challenging the two-party system.
7. Highlighting RFK Jr.'s unconventional campaign approach focusing on digital media platforms over traditional mainstream media outlets.
8. Issues related to Cornell West's campaign structure, financial burden, and shifting political allegiances.
9. Importance of older leaders stepping aside to make way for new blood, contrasting with the trend of older leaders in major parties holding onto power.
10. Decline in support for Cornell West due to his lack of adaptability to modern communication methods and perception as an agent of chaos.

Norman Finkelstein and Benny Morris are historians. Mouin Rabbani is a Middle East analyst. Steven Bonnell (aka Destiny) is a political livestreamer.

https://lexfridman.com/israel-palestine-debate-transcript

OUTLINE:

• 0:00 - Introduction
• 4:42 - 1948
• 1:03:14 - Partition
• 2:07:47 - October 7
• 3:01:59 - Gaza
• 3:28:34 - Peace
• 4:33:18 - Hope for the future

Hard Lens Media is a media company built to support activists, organizers, candidates and other groups with limited power reach a greater audience while informing our audience about people they have never heard of that are making a difference.

Edits:

• removed LIVE info, added video length
• updated yt link to timestamp at 5:38, intro

Timestamps:

• 5:38 Intro of show
• 6:54 Kit Cabello starts talking
• 19:32 Talking about 'the left'
• 26:01 Video of BJG and Cenk Uygur debate starts
• 1:23:58 Fani Willis, ruled to stay on Trump Case
• 1:40:44 George Galloway Pushes Back
• 1:54:59 Censorship with Tiktok
• 2:06:08 Don Lemon Show canceled on X, Elon Musk
• 2:23:47 Talking about Palestine-Israel Debate: Finkelstein, Destiny, M. Rabbani & Benny Morris