As a decentralized platform, Bluesky’s code is completely open source,
As long as a company is in control, being decentralized doesn't mean shit.
As a decentralized platform, Bluesky’s code is completely open source,
As long as a company is in control, being decentralized doesn't mean shit.
It can be mass produced in very little time.
Show me an application of Generative AI for teaching right now. As in, already existing.
What constitutes fair use?
17 U.S.C. § 107
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
GenAI training, at least regarding art, is neither criticism, comment, news reporting scholarship, nor research.
AI training is not done by scientists but engineers of a corporative entity with a long term profit goal.
So, by elimination, we can conclude that none of the purposes covered by the fair use doctrine apply to Generative AI training.
Q.E.D.
An HP Printer is a bad investment.
No, but we can build it. It's called a Directory. This is how Yahoo! worked before it got enshittified and eventually replaced by Google search.
Fuck, I got 50%. If others had the same result, you can guess the implications.
Also: "By everything holy, buy some bleach and clean your mold-ass room!"
(Never buys it)
I read a Twitter post of hers a few years ago where she was extremely apologetic towards China, saying that Americans listened to a lot of propaganda and so on. Now I'm starting to wonder if it was really her who made that twitter post.
I understand devs being busy. What I can't stand is their fan club who keep shitting on every user asking questions or not having the time to do a deep search on every single solution and the problems that come with it.
Maybe this is news for you, but FOSS communities are incredibly toxic. Every single suggestion or legitimate complaint is taken as a personal attack.
Then they wonder why people don't pay enough attention to Linux and Open Source Software in general.
Perhaps they should realize there's too many assholes in the community who keep driving people away. Normal folks have a limit. They just leave and hope their Windows doesn't crash away, which is less frustrating than having to personally deal not only with tech issues but the shitty attitude of peple who are knowledgeable enough.
Worse, when you want to point out a flaw, you need to build an exhaustive list of reddit posts, archive org pages and so on and face trial because unless you give every single piece of evidence then your complaint is invalid. And I'm sorry but normal people just don't have time for this shit.
Remember that joke? Ask for help and you get no response; Say linux sucks because you can't do X and you get dozens of apologetic posts explaining step by step how to do stuff.
Turns out there's some truth behind that joke.
Did the ordinance specify that the app companies would have to absorb the costs and NOT pass them to the users? No? Ah, well, that explains it then.