In fairness if you're a total technology troglodyte they can supply basic answers. But the moment there's a real glitch for which actual programmers are needed....
DISM SFC
Good luck!
In fairness if you're a total technology troglodyte they can supply basic answers. But the moment there's a real glitch for which actual programmers are needed....
DISM SFC
Good luck!
Okay, but I'm talking about violent coups really. Not just not-so-peaceful protests.
Even so, it seems violence didn't help the Union movement all that much either. I'm no expert though of course.
A few weeks to months following the rebellion. Maybe a year at most.
It's different if the rebellion does not itself topple the structures of government. I'm talking about violent coups specifically I suppose, not a bit of violent protesting that motivates an existing government to act.
It really isn't though. It's always two steps forward three steps back. Anything good that arises out of the destruction, always comes at an immense cost, and usually corrupts the revolutionary leaders who made it happen.
Is there any violent revolution in history for which genuine peace followed in the immediate aftermath?
I think violence is often necessary. But I wouldn't say it's ever the right answer.
Clearly not, but what's your point? Biden is president. Not saying it's right. But I think it's what any parent would do. Hunter isn't some moral monster. He's just messed up more than anything, in the way a kid in his situation might.
Not justifying it, but executive power is insane. Trump will break the law far more destructively with respect to Hunter then this pardon, or at least that's the fear I imagine Biden has.
Sure, your feelings are valid. Just explaining his actions, not justifying them.
Do you think Hunter Biden is safe in the US justice system with Trump in charge?
Sorry, I don't follow? 🙃 (Edit: but I like it!)
Thank you, you fine human soul for your service.
Need a surprised Pikachu with a MAGA hat meme.
Terrorism is supposed to be the dogmatic or ideologically motivated killing of civilians, often by those who are willing to die in the process. It's terror inducing because it could seemingly happen anywhere at any time to any one, and it's a lot easier to cause harm to others when you're suicidal and not trying to get away with it.
Of course, that's not how it's routinely used, or perhaps was ever really used by anyone except academics.