wozomo

joined 1 year ago
[–] wozomo 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It’s “mind-bogglingly,” fyi, unless you’re using “mind-bottlingly” in an intentionally ironic way

[–] wozomo 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who’s the first villain in the top left corner?

[–] wozomo 5 points 1 year ago

Ah, my accursed genetic forbearer

[–] wozomo 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully they’re as good as the Paramount+ show! /s

[–] wozomo 1 points 1 year ago
[–] wozomo 4 points 1 year ago

My homies call me Anakin because I always kill all the Yuenglings

[–] wozomo 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I understand the theory behind the production-line savings, but 100% do not believe that those savings will be passed on to the consumer, and am unconvinced that it actually is more cost-effective/materially efficient (incentive-wise, it’s in the best interests of the car manufacturers to convince us that this will be a good thing for us in the long-term).

They’re manufacturing the various components (like seats) on totally separate lines from the car and then assembling them. If every single component manufactured is the fanciest, priciest version—if every seat has a heater, a fan, and internet connectivity so it can be activated or locked—that’s certainly going to result in a more expensive base vehicle price vs manufacturing lower-tier components and feeding them into the assembly line as necessary.

A great example would be the Tesla batteries. They’re absolutely not putting the same battery in each car and then locking the ability to charge it beyond a certain point. Materials costs are a huge factor.

A non-vehicular example would be phones. There’s a reason why every iPhone doesn’t have the same components that are just subscription-locked.

The FSD side of things does feel different, though, I agree with you there. You’re paying for a consistently-updated, software-based service, but that’s not at all comparable to having to pay the original manufacturer to activate, say, the blind-spot indicators on a used car (unless they’re coming out and upgrading your mirrors from time to time).

[–] wozomo 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

…am I having a stroke? Isn’t the subscription-model literally “forcing people” to pay a higher base price because the car includes expensive (but disabled!) components that you then have to pay more money to unlock?

It’s a question of paying extra for a car with costly (to manufacture) subscription-locked features that you don’t want and won’t use vs being able to buy a stripped-down, base model with hand-crank windows, no?

Am I getting whooshed rn? That’s the only explanation that makes sense, that I’m missing the sarcasm or something.

[–] wozomo 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I’ve been seeing a lot of sensationalist posts from this user tbh

[–] wozomo 2 points 1 year ago

She’s enough of a chode that the Guardian shouldn’t have to resort to trash clickbait about how she hired the same web designer, jfc…

[–] wozomo 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Fuck yeah, subscription-unlocks for existing features on cars should be illegal, and until it is I fully support all jailbreaking/hacking of these companies’ products

view more: ‹ prev next ›