This is all great, i 100% agree with both points, but why should it be limited.
Add third point.
No genocide of Palestinians.
But No, democratic party will keep supporting and funding genociders and keep inviting them to give speeches in US Congress.
They are getting power to keep supporting genocide policy because of large number of people like you who do not question the authority and keep defending them.
It's extremely interesting that democratic politicians have not only managed people (traditional voters) into believing that this genocide is normal but if you demand or say anything against this genocide then these normal people will attack you instead of asking their party leader "Why is it essential for their party to keep supporting genocide?"
I think supporting/funding genocide shouldn't be democratic party policy, it would suit more on far-right. But reality is different.
Even after thousands of posts, emails to representatives, cases in court, protests in campuses and rallies. Democrats are eager to support/fund a genocide.
We sent posts, emailed the representatives, filed cases, protested (campuses and other places), protested in both major parties rallies.
Bernie tried to pass bill to stop funding of genocide. But who listens to Bernie, no one.
If you are democrat leader then you've the chance to win the votes of young, undecided voters by not funding or supporting genocide. You should know that if they vote for third parties in large numbers, then you are in great trouble.
Those votes are valuable. Accept our demands and take the vote.
Myxomatosis, listen man.
We do support the democrats on topics when they talk about respect and inclusivity of minorities in society but we also demand that they should not support/fund genocide. It's our demand from democrat leaders. Is it a wrong demand? You should tell me.
I commend your initiative that everyone should stand against genocide because condemning genocide is the most rational and humane thing to do.