twistypencil

joined 1 year ago
[–] twistypencil 2 points 2 months ago

FYI, you seem to misunderstand your kneejerk reactions

[–] twistypencil 8 points 2 months ago

You can find the specific rules on the sec site

[–] twistypencil 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hopes and prayers that he is able to clap back after being slammed

[–] twistypencil 1 points 2 months ago

I don't recognize who that is, so my mind isn't lost yet

[–] twistypencil 9 points 2 months ago

No thanks, I don't need to meet her

[–] twistypencil 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm not a stein fan, and I get the stein bashing because fuck Trump, so I only point this out because using this to bash her is not the most powerful argument you can make,because it's thin evidence that would never hold up in court.... but let's bash her on actual things, I'm all for that.

if you look up the details, you can easily find: Stein "attended at her own expense to spread a message of peace and diplomacy" and gave a speech in Moscow "in which she criticized the excessive militarism of both Vladimir Putin and U.S. leaders."

The Senate Intelligence Committee later investigated the trip and found no wrongdoing whatsoever.

Speaking to The Intercept in 2017, she said the notion that it was an "intimate roundtable" was "mythology," and that Putin and his associates "weren't at the table for very long." Stein said that "nobody introduced anybody to anybody" and that she "didn't hear any words exchanged between English speakers and Russians" due to the lack of a translator.

Stein said that Putin had appeared to make a speech and left immediately after. "Nobody cared to make introductions. This wasn't intended to be a discussion of any sort,"

Could be all lies, etc. but it's cheap and not substantial evidence in any way. I mean, a picture at a dinner table doesn't automatically mean anything, no matter how many strings you use to connect all the pictures in your CSI montage.

[–] twistypencil 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If she takes a toke...

[–] twistypencil 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

49 fake polls found to have been created, omitting silly things like saying only 10% of Penn voters will view this year. This is a set up, to justify the legal cases or fake elector schemes. Look how close the race was, they're is no way that we lost by so much, must be fraud!

[–] twistypencil 0 points 2 months ago

I bought two PAC packs

[–] twistypencil 8 points 2 months ago

Sick of trad media using outrage to get clicks

view more: ‹ prev next ›