A single Xeon in an R630 with 256GB RAM and redundant PSUs idles around 100W, and that is with no storage controller or other add-in cards, no SSDs or HDDs. Stick some storage, add-in cards and actual load and you could easily see 300W+
Add in a UPS with some conversion losses and some switches, maybe a couple PoE injectors... 600W isn't so far away
Yes we are looking at 2-3 generation old servers, but what do you expect for a home lab? It would be silly to pay a premium for newer equipment solely in the name of efficiency as the costs will far outweigh the energy savings. If you just care about being "green" then your money could do more spent elsewhere.
Sure one can run off old domestic hardware like old laptops/PCs or SBCs like a NUC/RPi but some of us are either trying to replicate a production environment or want/need ECC memory (or both).
Please don't belittle other people's setup just because you might not understand their motivations/constraints or think you might be able to do it "better".
Edit: Not to mention the parent comment said this includes his PC. My PC is a bastion of inefficiency when playing games; have you seen the TDP on current gen CPUs and GPUs?
This is self-hosting, it is inherently inefficient.
Consolidating servers, storage, power, cooling, networking is always more efficient.
From your example: one full bus is more efficient than any configuration of even the most efficient cars.
I do this for a bunch of reasons, including being a hobby. Hobbies aren't meant to be efficient; first and foremost they are meant to be fun ๐
I'm pretty chill. I'm not sure attacking someone's efficiency based on their power consumption for an unspecified rack/workload is very chill...