ahhhh yes, that makes perfect sense... thank you for pointing that out! Especially since I'm not good enough with vi to know how to bulk delete the first character in specific lines, I had to manually arrow and delete.
I successfully migrated postgres 15 to 16. I followed the general idea of the guide you posted, but I found it a little easier to do a slightly different process. Here's what I did:
docker-compose downfor the lemmy instance
~~2. edit the docker-compose.yml file and comment out all of the services except postgres. In addition, add a new volume to the postgres service that looks something like this: - ./volumes/miscfiles:/miscfiles~~
- edit the
docker-compose.ymlfile and add a new volume to the postgres service that looks something like this:- ./volumes/miscfiles:/miscfiles docker-compose up -d postgres(this starts just thepostgresservice from the docker compose file)docker exec -it [container name] pg_dumpall -U [username] -f /miscfiles/pgdumpall20240628(I think this will work, but it's not exactly what I did... rather, I randocker exec -it [container name] bash, and then ranpgdumpall -U [username] -f /miscfiles/pgdumpall20240628. The end result is a dumpall file saved in the./volumes/miscfilesdirectory on the host machine)docker-compose downmv ./volumes/postgres ./volumes/postgresBAK20240628(move your existing postgres data to a new directory for backup purposes)mkdir ./volumes/postgres(re-create an empty postgres data folder. make sure the owner and permissions match thepostgresBAK20240628directory)- edit the
docker-compose.ymland update the postgres image tag to the new version docker-compose up -d postgres(you'll now have a brand new postgres container running with the new version)docker-exec -it [container name] psql -U [username] -f /miscfiles/pgdumpall20240628(again, I think this will work, but Ibashed in and ran the command from within the container. This also allows you to watch the file execute all of the commands... I don't know if it will do that if you run it from the host.)docker-compose down
~~12. edit the docker-compose.yml and un-comment all of the other services that you commented out in step 2~~
docker-compose up -d
Hopefully that helps anyone that might need it!
edited to reflect the comment below
I agree... I was simply clarifying that Nate Silver did NOT predict that Hillary would win (nor is he predicting that Trump will win this election), which is a common misunderstanding about probability. For these types of models to be meaningful to the public, there needs to be literacy on what is meant by the percentages given. Really, I'm just reinforcing rodneylives' point from another angle!
I don't remember him predicting that she would win. His model (https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/) gave her a 71% chance of winning. 71% is a long way from 100%, and the result of that election definitely fit within the model.
That said, you are absolutely correct... we need to keep shining a light on the realities of each of these candidates, because in the light of day Biden is a much better choice than Trump.
Thank you, that's super helpful!
Stop j'terrorizing me!
Depending on what exactly you're looking for, Photostructure might be a good option. It's got a great UI for viewing photos, and it's meant to play well with other Metadata software.
I don't think I'd call them assholes... more just shortsighted about the realities of selling an album, specifically in how you refer to the album both in speech and in writing.
I gotta admit, I don't usually follow the draft since I don't know anything about college football. That said, it sounds like we hit a lot of our needs, including OL and DBs. Sounds like the receiver we took in Round 1 should fit in pretty well with what Shanahan wants in a receiver, so I'm excited to see how that goes. I have no complaints!
There's lots of youtube content on this subject... here's a decent jumping off point, if you're interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI
I have server2 (which replaced server1). I also have 'nvr1'.
view more: next ›
It was not a prediction of victory... it was a 71% chance of winning the electoral college. Said another way, they gave her a 29% chance of losing.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/