test113

I don't understand the unforeseen ramifications he's talking about for your entire family. I understand the main fear about uncertainty regarding what happens to the data, which is likely sold to the pharmaceutical sector or Institutions. However, what's the point? I don't support such companies, but it seems like there's a lot of fearmongering without much substance. It's not that different from an ISP or any company collecting data to sell to other companies or institutions. No one expected anything different, and those who did are likely just consumers who don't care about these issues at the end of the day.

I think the point is - it's disappointing to see GTA 5 2.0. I expected something more, something different, less generic, not just another coastal city or a GTA 5 clone. It seems like they just merged the engine update with GTA 5. Watching the trailer bored me, like being forced to watch a mediocre action comedy movie. I don't know how the majority of the game will feel, but this trailer is just so generic. If this were a movie, no one would care. Maybe that's the point, but still, my hype is somewhat gone. I at least expected a different scenario than this GTA 5 DLC story or at least set it somewhere other than a coastal city.

No, not exactly. Initially, it's merely a hypothesis. The article somewhat sensationalizes the professor's statements. The evolution of mammals was influenced by many factors, including the presence of other species like reptiles or dinosaurs. These species already occupied certain niches, compelling mammals to adapt in various ways, including developing shorter lifespans—a trait beneficial for evolution. It's not just the dinosaurs that are responsible, but rather the entire set of circumstances leading to human existence. The professor is attempting to pinpoint specific factors contributing to this evolutionary path.

Lol, you just described every open content platform out there. This is not a YouTube-specific problem. You can't personally control what's uploaded on these sites, but you can choose if and how you interact with it.

This article is stupid. All it says is: "Yep, humans like nature. After evolving in it for years, we kind of like nature. And here's a test that shows humans who walked in nature instead of in a city right before a numbers test tend to be better at one specific tested task." (This seems to be a shocking revelation for some...)

I don't understand. What do you want, a global monopoly in streaming? Piracy is merely a symptom of market issues, not a direct participant. Without paying customers and a legitimate market, piracy wouldn't exist.

Yes, it is not feasible; it costs more to extract it from the air than the benefit obtained from burning it, and then it still needs to be stored for at least a few hundred years in solid or gas form. Otherwise, it goes right back into the atmosphere and the effect will be null. We looked at a similar concept at my university, and the professor said, I quote, "Whoever comes up with these bullshit solutions does not really understand how climate change or physics works; it is not a solution to our problem." We also had a project like this in my city where they captured it just to sell it to a greenhouse, which releases it back into the atmosphere, so the concentration stays the same and, de facto, they have removed zero carbon from the air because it basically goes right back into the atmosphere. Actual solutions exist, but they are expensive and extensive; people will start implementing them in, let's say, 70-120 years from now, right around when we start feeling the full effects of rapid human-induced climate change.

Bro, what? The hot water is already hot, and no, the cost does not change much. The only difference is the storage cost; the energy input will be the same to heat it up (of course, depending on the heat source, the price can change - solar panels, electric, or fossil). And no, your showering is not really a problem. I don't know where you live, but where I live, personal household use accounts for about 3-5% of the water supply, so saying reducing the shower time or whatever will have 0 impact on water availability.

Oh, sorry, I misunderstood. My bad. I thought the outrage was about them collecting data, which is normal. ; but that's very strange. How did they connect your purchase/receipt to your email? Have you found out yet?

Don't all stores do this, particularly those with membership cards? Isn't one of the main reasons for these cards to track your purchases in exchange for discounts, besides fostering loyalty? All major stores in my area operate like this. If you use scan-and-pay with a smartphone or another device, joining their membership program is mandatory. They monitor what, when, and where you buy, and sometimes even why. I don't understand why this surprises some people.