And they will have opinion pieces showing the other side too.
teslasaur
And more than likely the times already have had an opinion pieces with the other side of the argument. But boo times cause they don't edit the OPINION page to my liking.
I think people are confused about what the "Opinion" page is. While i disagree with him, why would the times be accountable for opinion pieces?
Religion as a base of government is shit, regardless of which make-belief you got bred with.
I don't like labels, cause they simplify an opinion you might hold. But i suppose i have some atheistic views, and that's it.
Are they really saying the correct things?
I've seen plenty of interviews where where they say that "God is great" on repeat. Thats not what you want to hear from your potential governing body.
No, by all means post whateverthefuck to whereeverthefuck. Who cares
Those numbers doesn't mean anything for people.
Vegans would have a greater conversion rate by making the alternatives taste better and be cheaper.
Toronto jersey for anyone outside of Toronto. For those in Toronto. Bruins jersey with the number 7. You Canucks friend might also like a Bruins jersey with marchand on the back.
There are a lot options here but none that are generally funny, it would depend on age of the recipient and a bunch of different things.
Sidney Crosby jersey to a flyers fan.
Nashville Forsberg jersey to an avs fan.
Avs selänne jersey to an Anaheim fan.
Kings Gretzky jersey to an Oilers fan.
Kids are Reddit. If they sense weakness; the others will pile on.
I'm all for a little reddit-bashing but fucking lmao. Did they bully you on askreddit or something?
You didn't ask me anything? You made a slightly condescending comment.
You quoted something that isn't relevant to my point. But i acknowledge the existence of a flaw in my thinking, in that the fact doesn't say anything about the race of the father.
A statistic isn't popular, it just is. And the meme is dishonest for pretending it doesn't exist.
So by that logic, if you were an employer and your employee broke the law, you as the employer would be held accountable?
Thats the level of culpability that you imply. He who wrote the article is responsible for his opinion. Not the times.