You definitely have not.
tee9000
joined 5 months ago
Oh okay so you employ the same strategy as the article. Just provide enough text (with an LLM) in your response to discourage the reader from engaging meaningfully while amazingly saying nothing meaningfully related to our discussion.
The disinformation age sucks. I have no words for how much you suck. So unless your response to this message is a succinct, human-typed reply that makes a single related argument to the legitmacy of a candidates smell then good day to you, chatgpt.
Fight idiocy with idiocy?
You sure look smart citing sources though, my goodness. So when i ask why anyone would vote for someone based on smell, you cite "sources" that confirms he smells. Okayyy...
And your most relevant sentence is trying to say that trump is hypocritical because he has judged people based on their smell? So you think we should be holding ourselves to trumps standards?
Maybe explain to me one more time, in your own words, why a candidates smell should be a factor when im deciding how to vote for?
I read as much garbage as i could. That is longest, most rambling article i could imagine. You want to actually put it in your own words? Because saying we can politically judge candidate smell because trump sniped politicians for petty reasons as well is not a reason; its a logical fallacy. You want to spew meaningless hate like trump? And if a candidate comes along that is perfect for america but has an odor, you promise to hate them too?
Why would I, or anyone vote for someone based on their smell?
Hey whats your background in this field?
Are you also saying it will never work no matter how many iterative improvements are made for the design, and no matter how cheap production becomes after refining the manufacturing process?
Wait what happened? Why are you downvoted? Did anyone answer you?
Can you do something different for your career? Seems like you hate it.
Americans are dumb enough to engage with content like this, so probably.
Hey guys, be careful. Articles become popular when people relate to them, not because they are a good article.
Dont feel hopeless and dont resign yourself to failure because others might be unable to function.
Functioning is good... dont let this potentially misleading representation of generations of people make you think you should stop trying.
Mental health is hard to come by on social media, and this article is a great example of reinforcing a self sabotaging attitude.
Good luck, have fun, and kick ass in your own way today.
Do they look like that though?
Thats your own fault. My request was simple. You have not commented on the smell of a candidate contributing or detracting from their ability to hold office. You just said trumps fans may hate it, and trump indeed smells, and that trump has done bad things including telling people they smell.
Still waiting for your answer to the original question.
Edit: "facts" lmao