Hahaha no decisions at the top u thought shit magically works no humans in charge HAHAHAHAH
synceDD
joined 2 years ago
So?
Edit wait are you claiming redditor is an ad hominem? Do you think that migrating to lemmy from reddit for a month puts you so much higher above redditors that u perceive being called one as an attack directed against you??? LMFAOOOOOO
It is not a law in most places yet and yet you defended the other guy when you said he was claiming apple is violating his repair rights and that I was arguing in bad faith??
One guy interprets enjoying property peacefully as in repair rights, you interpret it as dont hit your neighbour with it and I'm the one trolling, amazing. Enjoying peacefully means you have the recognized right to own shit. Here is an example of violating that right and stealing someone's shit in wikipedia right under the property article
In the case of Mifsud and others v Malta (38770/17) the Maltese state was found to have violated Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the convention. The case involved a plot of land owned by the Mifsud family and their heirs which was expropriated twice (in 1984 and in 2012)
Expropriate definition: (especially of the state) take away (property) from its owner.
so how do you enjoy your possessions peacefully if they break? is repairing them....not peaceful?
Lmao he said that according to government he should be able to not only own but also enjoy his property peacefully so yeah literally a government sponsored peaceful state of mind.
He's talking about the right to repair you're own stuff or have someone look at it.
Your argument was this, not anti-consumer, so even though none of his sources mentioned a right to repair by government, only a right to own, a private entity making their parts hard to swap would not necessarily infringe on that repair right, as far as we are concerned it could only cover being allowed to attempt whatever repairs you want. Now, if you manage to find a source about that right to repair that ALSO mentions easy repairs by third parties, we can argue further
Dont know which comments belong to your inbox but you instantly found block button what a quick learner, now you only have to achieve your government-backed peaceful state of mind 🤠
peaceful enjoyment of his possessions
That obviously means government recognizing you have the right to own it and not arbitrarily depriving you of your property, maybe the other declaration below should have given you a clue 🤠. Now if u wanna claim the "peace" is referring to your mental state, then I can also claim I'm not at peace if my stuff cant give me a blowjob. Be reasonable and stop grasping at straws.
So if it breaks, and i can't repair it, then I lose this property.
No, if your property breaks you still own property, broken property. The company is only responsible for a certain lifespan, it is called guarantee, dont like it, dont buy it.
if a company prevents you from repairing your equipment
They dont you are allowed to do whatever you want to it
that company is either unwilling
Theyre only responsible for guarantee
do you consider the failure of the property to be an act of god which the vendor is in no way responsible for
He is responsible for guarantee
You dont care about law after debating its definition for 10 comments and defending others mentioning it nice