Im not attempting to "gatekeep" anything. I'm pointing out that drawing a parallel between a keyword-based chat it script and a full LLM is disingenuous.
stom
I did click your link. The accepted answer there states:
"The term artificial intelligence denotes behavior of a machine which, if a human behaves in the same way, is considered intelligent.
Again, I don't think that selecting basic responses based on keywords found in the string meets the criteria for being qualified as an AI, as anyone with experience of a chat bot this simple knows it won't hold up the illusion of "intelligence" for very long.
I did mean "equate", you're correct. The rest of my point remains - a very simple chat-bot like this is leaps and bounds from what would be termed an AI these days. To equate the two is misleading.
Selecting a canned-text response based on simple keywords is a long way from AI, and it's foolish to ~~equivocate~~ equate the two of them.
Also, chill tf out, and don't be so aggressively presumptious. I have enough experience with the topics in question to point out how misleading this statement is.
A bunch of IF statements don't qualify as an AI. That's not how that works.
Effort!
I don't usually want to contribute my own opinion. I just want to read other people's and silently judge them if they disagree with me.
For an insured, qualified, responsible professional? Seems unlikely.
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Yer Maws a dog
And so are you
The worst part is anyone thinking this bullshit is remotely plausible.
I can't imagine how this work, but I'd like to know so I can upgrade my Christmas celebrations
Huh? Wrap the bands around the end?
But I need my cuda :(
This seems like the cost of a game that they are unable to charge op for. Do you feel like they are not entitled to the money owed?
They could have just removed the game from the account, at least this way op is alerted of the issue and given a chance to correct it without an interruption to his entertainment.