sibachian

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

definitely the case for Valve. Corporate vultures will be all over it the second he's gone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

steam came at the exact right moment to prevent region locking regulations for online gaming. granted companies and special interests still want to de-globalize gaming for licensing cash, but that's never going to happen as long as steam is a monopoly. any company taking a cheap shot at steam such as epic or discord or EA can go suck it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

As long as Gaben is alive steam will be the good guy. Even if they charge 30%, and I thinm it's why things are actually pretty neat on steam on the consumer end, because they can either choose to bill the consumer or the developer, and I'm personally always pro-consumer first - albeit for small indie publishers they should (if they already don't have); a means to launch a company with their game and not give 30% to Valve and be kept from much needed resources to grow their business, much like Valve would benefit from such deals long-term if the developers do a good job and bring in a lot of buyers with their next title in the future. AAA companies is a whole different matter, no passion, no soul, just money-milking-bullshit, should charge them 50% to 70%! they get off easy with a measly 30%.

But yeah, as for the overall topic itself, I do not understand why anyone would want another netflix situation. I don't want 300 game libraries and accounts installed on my computer, eating up resources, time, and email space - if I could have just one, super convenient and nice place where all is collected and no foreseeable concern that it will suddenly go bankrupt and die and take my investments with it (like some of the game libraries already have). If that ever becomes the case (e.g. when Gaben dies one day), I'll be the first to sail the high seas out of spite and convenience. I'm fine with monopolies as long as they benefit the end-user first, like Valve.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

yes. they're "censoring" algorithms designed to create engagement=profit, which are causing massive harm to society. i don't see anything wrong with it at all. and like you, i'm on the fediverse because there isn't an algorithm, our exposure is curated by us, not by engagement-bot-5.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

.se mirror still up and working. looks like it was just a DMCA on the main domains.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

the problem is privatization for things that doesn't even make sense to privatize. if the cost of discovery is too high for a private entity then why are they the ones to supply it? they aren't actually doing anything but taking the foam from the top of what everyone else have collectively created. it's like the privatization of energy, a natural monopoly that literally runs into negative value through surplus. or the privatization of mandatory services that cannot be sustained at cost such as nation wide mail delivery. if it doesn't make sense the right choice is the only choice yet here we are lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

what's wrong with MX? isn't it basically just debian stable but with xfce as default?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

this wasn't a problem with cashless infrastructure tho, this was a problem with monoculture. if the globe stopped using microsoft for gov and business, and instead threw their tax money towards open development; as in - the people, not microsoft, these kind of global issues wouldn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

sounds like they rather spend that RND on pocket lining over contributing to software dev.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

just like email.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

well to be fair bitcoin is on point as a decentralized currency.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The law must apply to all, including public servants. As they are beholden to the public, they are subject to review and FOIA requests are automatically granted for the content.

Now I'm suddenly not so against this law. Journalists paradise. They'll have a field day!

view more: ‹ prev next ›