rishado

Or maybe it's not a simple answer? Have you considered actually thinking about what happened instead of looking for a zinger headline?

You want this to be true because it's a simple explanation, just like Republicans. Stop being so immature and look at the actual dogshit platform she ran on and think again. You just defined confirmation bias in your comment. Doesn't make it true

Crazy what happens when you actually appeal to your constituents

No, because the truth is not as simple as that. Dems ran on a terrible campaign again, and lost again. Underselling "our" party's shortcomings is a surefire way to another loss next cycle.

Disagree, Harris would not have been close to winning at all if there was a primary. Even Tim Walz would have absolutely smoked her in a primary.

Looks like basically every new voter was Republican

And it specifically does say he was in the process of getting a license for peanuts the squirrel, but he also has been doing this for 7 years. And only now was he in that process.

Licensed? Maybe reread that article, bud. Disingenuous.

I feel like these are kneejerk reactions to the headline. Think with your brain not your heart (I'm not trying to be an ass, forget about the cutesy animals and think about this guy owning wild animals and exploiting them for money on social media) The cruelty is not the point. You can't just own wild animals without a license and without veterinary care...

I mean his team royally fucked him lol I'd be salty too

Absolutely brain dead from McLaren and Mercedes, I mean I don't even understand what the thought was here. It was lose lose