ripripripriprip

Peer to peer connection, no matchmaking.

That would be plenty for a co-op doom. Barebones? Yes. Needs barely any upkeep? Also yes.

My first guess as well. It's almost like knowing it's weird helped?

Humans and LLMs learn in fundamentally different ways, though.

The nuance bit is really interesting, since I feel that nuance arises from these fundamental differences.

I think that proves the author's point. I also think you're right in regards to the comment you replied to.

I do think some characters need to be tweaked. I also think it's ok if it's just silly fun.

I think I would rather see the entire roster approach OP vs trying to balance everything perfectly, as that is likely a fool's errand.

How? It's an overwatch with new characters to experiment with.

I expected it to be a janky mess but it actually plays well.

Most people stop taking care of themselves in their mid twenties and it catches up to them in their thirties.

There's a Forbes source on his wealth.

2048, 10000000000

"How I want to live", or how I actually live, is by not paying exorbitant prices at events like this (or exorbitant prices elsewhere).

I'll go eat somewhere actually tasty before a game. In other areas I'm fairly frugal, as well.

Mobilizing some movement with enough people putting on an embargo to lower prices? Not even gonna try.

I do, think the OP is a step in the right direction and I'll focus on that. I understand everything, in general, is too expensive.

Yeah, steps in the right direction are steps in the right direction.

Previous practice outrageous? Yup. New practice awesome? Yup. It's ok to recognize both.

I feel like it'd be a miserable life if you took the negative part of this story and ran with that instead of the more positive side.

"This doesn't affect me therefore it should be a non-issue for everyone else."