recursivesive

joined 1 year ago
[–] recursivesive 95 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're not oblivious, they just don't care because they know there won't be any consequences. And those few who dare to say anything are "antisemite" for not supporting genocide.

[–] recursivesive 5 points 1 year ago

I came just to say this. I have a Brother MFC-L2700DW that I bought in 2018. I only connect it to the power when I need to scan or to print, which it does flawlessly every single time, over WiFi, and disconnect it again. The toner is the original one that came with the printer.

Stop giving money to the ink parasites.

[–] recursivesive 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if you're referring to just the functionality of being able to pay by tapping the phone, but there's Google Pay, which does exactly that and is mostly accepted wherever apple's solution is accepted. It works in any Android phone with NFC.

[–] recursivesive 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The reason they put this kind of limits is to protect the income (of coming?) companies. Nobody wants pesky people growing their own stuff, but spending taxable money. Even nicer "for everybody" if the initial money comes from lobbying companies paying for the law to be favorable to them.

[–] recursivesive 5 points 1 year ago

Just remember Sega of America accused of trying to axe 40 percent of unionized staff. Don't give your money to these shitheads.

[–] recursivesive 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The app is called Fennec F-Droid and is maintained by Mozilla. Just clarifying so it can be found.

[–] recursivesive 5 points 1 year ago

Könntest du einen schreiben, um deine Beiträge vor dem Posten zu übersetzen? 🤔

[–] recursivesive 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is no reason a camera cannot be on all the time... Why couldn't it?

Sensor wear, mechanical parts (if any), heat, etc. Essentially wear and tear. Just like nothing lasts forever, using it in a way that it's not intended/tested/quality assured, may reduce its lifespan.

Basically: "is the device intended to be on and recording 24/7?"

  • yes: good, the device should last and perform for its purpose
  • no: well, let's gamble and see how long it lasts
[–] recursivesive 5 points 1 year ago

Glad to know. 2-3 years is a good lifetime, especially when compared against keeping the phone unused and stored in a drawer.

[–] recursivesive 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The camera is on all the time

That's what I meant: I don't know (as in I have zero clue) the camera is designed to operate that way. Is a naive assumption on my side and I'd be glad to learn this is not the case.

PIR sensor

No, I didn't expect a sensor, that's what I tried to say: the hardware is not there, so (on my mind) a constant image analysis/monitoring would be necessary in order to perceive movement and start recording, as in writing video to storage.

[–] recursivesive -4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'm not aware of software to achieve this, but I assume it wouldn't be possible to activate the camera based on motion detection, as the phones do not have hardware for this. Sure, it could be possible to have the camera working 24/7 and only record when there's movement in front of it (e.g. watching for pixel changes in the image being captured) but I doubt these cameras can sustain that kind of uninterrupted use, meaning at some point they will just fail. Just my thoughts, as I find the idea interesting but would love to have that same kind of solution.

[–] recursivesive 5 points 1 year ago

Looks very nice. Kudos.

view more: ‹ prev next ›