rdri

Wait till you learn about spiders flying high above...

I doubt devs meant that side of "woohoo our game is DRM free". Even if that would be fine by me, you can see they are missing a lot. Cool if the developer got so much money they don't care about sales. But that could mean they also don't care much about user satisfaction or feedback.

There is a downside. The best looking option - the developer website option - comes without regional pricing. This makes it the worst option for many.

People like having stuff on their Steam account because there is a value to that. Other people should stop acting like it doesn't matter.

Letting Fortnite money fund some developer is only good for that developer (and for some time), not the industry.

The main one I'd say is the 30% cut.

My account is in a similar state, but that's where I strongly disagree. The whole 30% debacle is worthless. Basically it's the only one thing that Tim found that would seem a valid complain in customers eyes. It's not. There is no evidence that lower cut would allow anyone to create and support a platform like (or better than) Steam. Customers will not win anything if the cut would be lower.

I think people should pay more attention to actual prices of digital goods. The perceived amount of injustice is way higher in "I must pay $X to try and enjoy this game" lately than in "developer must give some amount of profit to platform creators".

Do you think that op and me weren't specifically talking about it being contradictory?

I wouldn't call it contradictory, because the original material has to many other problems. It's like calling coal dirty. The original post is a meme and it works fine for me.

Other questions: ok yes even though I don't think it matters, no, with the whole premise of injecting possibility of nonsense into the discussion in order to avoid contradictions (in a boring unfunny way).

blame op for keeping it vague.

I have more reasons to blame the book for being vague.

Also why are you ignoring in your response anything about the fact that your injection was seemingly off-topic and the consequences of the misunderstanding that it seemingly caused?

I don't see it like that.

It doesn't seem like you can contribute to any religion based discussion if you're willing to accept that many possibilities (interpretations) of basic concepts or events. This also reminds me of how flat-earthers justify stuff.

I see. You're only generally accepting that there may be crazy justifications for anything. But this very aspect switches the topic of discussion to "we'll never know bruh", thus silencing the discussion. I've also talked to some people who told me about their god. My impression is that their logic is mostly the same as the above. Arguing with them is mostly useless, but it doesn't remove my desire to argue. "Leave them alone" is basically what your logic says, and I disagree that I shouldn't express myself in discussion.

if it was created for light cycles?

Since those light cycles existed before the sun was created there is no reason for the sun to exist.

maybe God has multiple personalities and they like to fuck with each other

Or the god is a bunch of aliens. Or some other fantasy. If you wish to pose such twists as parts of arguments I'd guess your point is to remove any value from conversation in order to stop more people from taking a part (aka trolling).

God could have made light circles (days) without the sun.

For what reason was the sun created then?

Judging by the size, just another electron app.

Correct, it's impossible. And anticheat will not help with identifying such complex cheats.