Bad faith arguing obviously IS a violation of Rule 1 and one his own users accept given that's apparently what people were reporting others for, and it's the commonly accepted definition of the term anyway.
Calling out a mod obviously can't be a violation of Rule 1 because it leads to abuses like this. It's not about me. It's about the other guys he was threatening, and using me as an emotional cudgel to bully the other users into compliance.
If that's what you think acceptable moderation is on your platform, you ought to step down, too. You can prove me right by banning me for saying that, or you can preserve the integrity of your platform by actually doing something about him. Your choice.
We all pay bills in the real world, my friend, and we accept the principles of democracy so we CAN pay bills and not be lorded over by dipshit wannabe tinpot tyrants.
But we both know you just don't want to admit you're wrong about this. I'm sure the other guy who was threatened to be banned for speaking out as well thinks that's a perfectly okay way to accept users.
Actually .world requires user donations to function anyway so your point is DOUBLY moot