octalfudge

joined 2 years ago
 

4.5W vs 0.3W

 

Apple Watch Series 9 (41mm) 282 mAh Apple Watch Series 8 (41mm) 282 mAh Apple Watch Series 9 (45mm) 308 mAh Apple Watch Series 8 (45mm) 308 mAh Apple Watch Ultra 2 564 mAh Apple Watch Ultra 542 mAh

 

iPhone 15: 3,349mAh iPhone 15 Plus: 4,383mAh iPhone 15 Pro: 3,274mAh iPhone 15 Pro Max: 4,422mAh

iPhone 14: 3,279 mAh iPhone 14 Plus: 4,325 mAh iPhone 14 Pro: 3,200 mAh iPhone 14 Pro Max: 4,323 mAh

 

The iPhone could be a Thread border router, but it probably shouldn’t be

The iPhone could control Thread smart home devices faster

Thread could replace Bluetooth as a way to connect peripherals like the Apple Watch to your iPhone

Thread would be fine for most smartwatch uses but not for audio streaming

Thread might just be a bonus radio

 

From $79 to $99

[–] octalfudge 19 points 1 year ago

More info:

https://asahilinux.org/2023/08/fedora-asahi-remix/

https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/110825522690584932

Some key points:

  • We aim to officially release the Fedora Asahi Remix by the end of August 2023.
  • Very soon after Asahi Linux started (well before our Arch ARM-based release), Neal Gompa joined our IRC channels and we started talking about working towards integrating our work into Fedora... The Fedora Asahi project started in late 2021, and work began in 2022 alongside the Arch ARM release.
  • Working directly with upstream means not only can we integrate more closely with the core distribution, but we can also get issues in other packages fixed quickly and smoothly. This is particularly important for platforms like desktop ARM64, where we still run into random app and package bugs quite often.
[–] octalfudge 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for sharing this, I really had no idea about this despite having played music for a long time, and trusted what Adam Neely said blindly.

[–] octalfudge 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think for some cases the app already in the App Store has ads and other monetisation (e.g. IAP). In these cases the app is modified to remove these and allow you to get the benefits that were behind a paywall in-game

[–] octalfudge 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's because in the discussion threads on Fedora Discussion, this point has already been raised and a "somewhat satisfactory" answer has been given?

Michael had been working on open source projects and Fedora since before he was a Red Hatter. They have a clause in their code of conduct that for community projects, they are allowed to go against Red Hat's interests.

I believe that Red Hat has been pulling funding from Fedora, and thus people in the Fedora project wants to collect additional metrics to persuade Red Hat otherwise.

I believe that drafting a revised proposal is a normal part of the Fedora change process https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/pgm_guide/changes/, and I think they allow anyone to raise change requests, and change requests don't mean they are a done deal. All change requests are reviewed by FESCo.

I'm new to this, so please correct me if I'm wrong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›