nyctre

joined 1 year ago
[–] nyctre 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean... you'd be doing it on a ship. And there'd be stuff to hold on to.

[–] nyctre 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How would one allow additional bracing? You can use the same amount of bracing for both, just depends on where the bracing surfaces are. What am I missing?

[–] nyctre 2 points 1 week ago

:/ that's so messed up. I'm sorry.

[–] nyctre 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Which province is that? Or at least what country

[–] nyctre 0 points 2 weeks ago

That's not how facts and opinions work, I'm sorry. Good luck!

[–] nyctre 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Again, yes really. I'm sorry you're offended, but that's just how some things are. When you don't understand something, it's not because you're stupid, it's because you haven't tried to understand it. And you've literally admitted to not trying to understand outer wilds.

And that's that. It's fine, you don't have to. But every thing you think you know or feel about it is made up, since you've never actually experienced it. Imagine going on Google maps and rating some place you've never been to. Or those people that give ratings to books and movies that aren't out yet. That's you in this situation. And well.. now THAT is something I'll never understand.

[–] nyctre 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yes, really. There's an exception to literally every single rule. And this game was an exception to many people's rules. Could be yours too. You won't know until you experience it. You can pretend you know what it is all you want meanwhile, but that's all it is, pretending.

[–] nyctre 2 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Looks? So you've never played it? Then you can't comment. Only way to actually get it is to play it or at least watch someone play it blindly.

[–] nyctre 6 points 2 weeks ago

Vowels. Plural. You only used one. Could've at least gone for "furries" xD

[–] nyctre 0 points 3 weeks ago

Right. Well, yeah, I guess your pedantic response is a lot more logical than the intended answer that other people have pointed out. Have a nice day!

[–] nyctre 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm not saying it's impossible for him to win. Definitely not counting our chickens yet. But many people in Romania vote for familiar names, for the big parties. He's an independent and most people have never heard of him. In your case, that was the incumbent. It's a big difference.

He somehow managed to get 2.1 million votes. That's huge and a major surprise as everyone is saying. But it's another thing to get 4-5 million votes. Yes, he'll get more votes in the second round, but in order to win, he'll need to more than double his votes. (He got 2.1 million out of almost 9.5 million votes) Which is unlikely. Not impossible, no. There's still a chance that people will be dumb. But it's unlikely.

[–] nyctre 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It's sad, yes. But, he doesn't have nearly enough votes to win in the second round. Especially since the votes were super split among a bunch of guys. Most people will just vote for his opposition, Lasconi and Romania will have the first female president. Who is also only the 2nd or 3rd worst option, which is better than I expected. All in all, feels like a win to me.

view more: next ›