nyctre

joined 2 years ago
[–] nyctre 15 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly. If there was only one currency for all old content, everyone would just do the most efficient farm and buy everything that way and not interact with any of the related content.

[–] nyctre 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I wish you were right, something tells me that even with an 80-100$ pricetag it'll still be one of the most successful games ever released.

Look at diablo4, for example. 70$ base game, 90 for deluxe, and 100 for ultimate plus mtx in the store at stupid prices. And apparently it's sold over 6 million copies and made over 600 mil in revenue in the first week. And it's not even a good game, in my opinion.

[–] nyctre 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, definitely it was because of your issues and not just because it was a bad game. How did disco Elysium gross 84 mil being such a political game, again? Helldivers 2? Cyberpunk? Rdr? Metal gear? Fallout? Deus ex? Papers please?

C'mon.. I've never heard of a good game being unpopular because of its politics.. are there any?

[–] nyctre 3 points 5 days ago

Dunno, based on my 30+ years of experience, I'd say I'm pretty tolerable. Ever considered you might be the problem?

[–] nyctre 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

First of all, resorting to insults, great show of intelligence.

Second of all, if you need me to explain to you the difference between ignorance and stupidity, or the average bigot and people with actual mental disability then you have some catching up to do before we can discuss this topic.

[–] nyctre 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

🤡 you're the racist if that's what you get from that image.

[–] nyctre 17 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Ignorance is not a disability, it's a choice. So no, it's not a slur for mental deficiency.

[–] nyctre 14 points 5 days ago (7 children)

None. Don't insult people over stuff they can't control. Call them ignorant shitheads not ugly/retarded/etc.

[–] nyctre 1 points 5 days ago

Well, I guess we'll see. Maybe she'll do good as he claims

[–] nyctre 2 points 5 days ago

Yes, in the context and ignoring everything else, sure, I agree. But to me, it makes no sense how someone could believe that republicans are somehow pro big business but anti big tech. Talking about these things as if they're unrelated doesn't make sense to me. Maybe I'm just missing something, I guess.

[–] nyctre 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Ok, maybe he wasn't praising republicans as a whole, but he did praise trump for picking a big tech lobbyist in a job in which he claims to want the opposite. "Great pick!" is a praise, you can't deny that, can you?

"Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote."

That's their official account complaining about the guy's daughters being lobbyists, not even him directly. Why is the appointment of Gail Slater, who worked the internet association (big tech lobbyists) and fox corporation, a great pick?

[–] nyctre 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why say "big business" and not "big tech" then if it's just tech?

view more: next ›