Not an option in this hypothetical.
Can you answer the simple question?
null
joined 1 year ago
I cringe every time I see this come up.
Because it isn't what you actually mean, and the horrible logic of it makes it easy for the Lemmy Lefties to dunk on.
Of course a 3rd party vote isn't a vote for Trump any more than it is a vote for Kamala.
What it actually is is a discarded opportunity to vote against Trump. Which is also dispicable, but actually accurate.
Everyone knows that's what you mean by this, but the Lemmy Lefties will play dumb and latch onto that logical fallacy every time.
If you had to vote for Trump or Kamala, which would you choose?
I work on a 20+ year knowledge base for a big company that has had no real content management governance for pretty much that whole time.
We knew there was duplicate content in that database, but were talking about thousands of articles, with several more added daily.
With such a small team, identifying duplicate/redundant content was just an ad-hoc thing that could never be tackled as a whole without a huge amount of resources.
AI was able to comb through everything and find hundreds of articles with duplicate/redundant content within a few hours. Now we have a list of articles we can work through and clean up.
It's America but also not
You're being downvoted because you're just flat-out wrong.
"86" doesn't mean "hold this item", it means the kitchen is out of that item.
So no, it wouldn't make sense even to people that know restaurant lingo.
There isn't one, they just got a new voice actor.
This wasn't a hypothetical, it was a verbatim account of this thread: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/29416900
Nah, it's an HTTP error.
Why is it a shame?
Neat! Not really related to the meme though
Trust me, I'm well aware of Objection.