nintendiator

joined 1 year ago
 

As the link details, this is a project by Google to add a system not only to web clients, but also to web servers, that performs Device Attestation so that the website can control how, and if, a web browser or a machine in general can visit it.

As expected from Google, this is basically a combination of DRM and Anti-Adblock. They try to sell it as a way to """"only"""" perform nonidentifying checks, but in the same document in their section of open issues they leave to the air how to prevent their users (websites) from using it to discriminate web browsers that don't complain with certain criteria (such as "be Google Chrome").

There are various Issues opened already to let these people know the evil they are creating. One notable is here (28), and this social media thread follows the more general issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I seem to remember something like that was discussed at some point in Signal Community and one of the big arguments contra was that the normies and even some advanced people who use Signal just don't "get" UX warnings any more: you could have put all the red tabs, cross signs and unlocked padlocks on the screen you wanted, they were still gonna complain openly on the internet and discredit Signal for not actually "securing muh messages". It's actually part of the same argument why they don't let you export your own messages.

Besides, having to use the same engine (tab and all) in the same app for two things with vastly different reaches of security was murder on the dev team. There were things they were not able to keep testing because of clashing against SMS compat. It is one of the reasons why I think the smart thing to have done would have to keep the "original" app as the Signal SMS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dropping SMS alas was necessary (and not just for Signal, but for messengers-with-SMS as well) because of the general play Google is doing with SMS → RCS. IMO, Signal held the idiot ball quite strongly by not just picking TextSecure from their old archives, tuning it up and releasing it as an updated, separate "Signal SMS" app.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The weather as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying doctors et all should not be paid for their work. I'm saying it should not depend on a money transaction on the afflicted citizen. I think it's perfectly feasible to, for example, have the State pay for things that are essential, it's kind of the entire role of the State after all. Or even better, give doctors and providers of those services the same treatment as in not collecting from them for stuff.

Also, if there's such things as "companies Too Big To Fail should be handed over to the State", then that also applies to Tasks Too Big To Fail. Like, you know, keeping your citizens alive. I insist: the core task of the State is to keep the Country alive.

If that collapses the economy, IMO that's an indicative that the economy model is not good, or perhaps even unethical.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Don't you mean a quarter of the footprint? It's half the size per side.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Actually, they should more-than-mirror inflation.

See, most people only have one job, so one source of payment. But they have N expenditures: health, food, electricity, transportation.

If inflation increases those general prices 20%, that's 4 (or 5, or 6, or...) 20% increases in cost. Since currently wages are already lower than the cost of living, a raise in pay mirroring inflation would allow it to cover for one of those increases, on average, so the employee now has actually become poorer than before.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Of course, but maybe destroying the modern economy is a good thing. Things like serving essential needs causing hyperinflation showcases that modern economy is purposefully built to make people lose. No matter what you try to do to help society, something (or rather, someone) counterplays you.

IMO the real solution is that things that are essential, like food and health, should not depend on money exchange to be provided, period. Sure, producers of food and providers of health should be paid for their work, but that payment should not have a codependence with the fact that the hungry or unhealthy person get the attention they need.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The issue starts when everyone gets a blanket pay raise across industries and communities for no reason.

And this is the failure of your theory. The raise is not "for no reason", that's just capitalism apologia talk. it's because being in a community (aka: society) now costs more.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It costs money to produce food.

The more people you want to feed, the more money it costs.

Food production is not free. Food distribution is not free.

Then it should be a task of the State, as "feeding people" is, quite obviously, a task Too Big to Fail. And, as such, the State can (and should) just automatically print the money needed to reward the work done. Feeding the hungry should not depend on a "budget". A budget is basically putting a price on human lives.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Meta

Annoying. Evil. Greedy. A machine designed to enhance, promote and reward sociopathy, just as capitalism is in general. Ultimately unneeded.

's Threads

Just about the same. A pisshole representing much of the worst of humanity.

and other instances preparing to defederating from them?

Just good praxis. Preventive care, and the simplest measure of such that any respectable instance would take. . Effectively self-defense and should count as that if for some weird reason it came down to legal trials.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

undefined> , maybe not as a social media platform, but surely as a public service/news platform it has some merit.

If the distribution of some emergency news and public service news is so important that you have to have it during emergencies, then it's Too Big To Fail and must not be held by a corporation, but implemented by the government. Every service such as police, firefighters, etc, should have a public RSS or Atom service announcement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Internet Archive archives now have DRM

Like, what's even the point of having them, then? Not much of an "Archive", are they? Didn't expect IA of all places to get enshittified.

 

Hello, mostly-PC person here who still doesn't understand much. I recently upgraded my old unlocked phone to an unlocked one with LineageOS (in case the Android ROM matters for this). Want to set up the most important things such as banking apps for this, and I'm hitting a knowledge block.

Back in my time, we used Magisk for customizing phone modules and most importantly for hiding root and custom ROM status from apps that demand a "Google experience". For the newer phone I wanted to do this, but I'm finding extremely conflicting information on what is the current status of Magisk and if it should be used.

On one side, Magisk seems to still exist and still to be the recommended way for installing modules on phone, and it's still available on F-Droid.

On the other one, I find verifiable information that the developer of Magisk went to work with Google of all companies, plus indications that they removed the hide root mechanic from the program and that other stuff might be removed or the software abandoned outright.

So, in light of that I thought of asking here. Is Magisk still "legit" for custom ROMs? If it's not / if it's been enshittified, what is the current way to hide root from eg.: banking apps?

Thanks in advance.

view more: next ›