Speech 100! Hahaha
Well, yeah. I know some of that stuff indirectly. Haven't been here for long, but there's a few of the concepts that appear over and over again, and are useful in actual conversation, even if sometimes not perfectly precise.
I'll start using "the material conditions of this codebase won't allow for the unfolding of such feature". Or something.
It's really hard to dig deeper into all/most of the concepts.
I also just remembered of "contradiction".
I was there in 2007. I'm happy to see some noise again, after those were demobilised back then.
It's important because it's visible, it teaches you all young peoples how to organise and talk politically. Definitely taught me a lot.
Love it!
Notice I didn't specifically ask about how they look. My example was about something they/we say.
What's something someone would do/say that would have you think "one of us", about them?
When studying or in classes I usually take note of structure, questions, and stuff I find unexpected.
In structure, I just go for quick notes on how one topic flows into another expectedly. Means no surprises and I can probably retrace those steps myself.
Then I note in questions to be asked or researched about specific points. I don't usually note down the answer unless unexpected.
And then, I note the unexpected things, where I think I can't derive myself from the overarching structure. Terminology and specifics usually fall under this category.
If everything is unexpected, well, that's a sign that maybe I'm not ready for that level of content yet. So I'll generally go for more introductory content before I tackle it again.
On a side note, I don't personally annotate books, but lots of researchers do (I'm not a researcher), and actually defend that respecting a book is annotating it thoroughly. So. That's another take on it. :)
Or, you know. Just stop using reddit.
Yes. "common sense" is the repetition of dominant ideology. They can bang on "common sense" and destroy things. We have to deconstruct common sense so. That we can build the future.
Why is this question asked here every 2 weeks?
Yes! Would be interesting to see some international personalities too!
What do you mean "like these"?
Usually businesses changing privacy policies are the ones without a revenue model that need to figure it out somehow, and aim to IPO.
10$/month way more revenue than they could be able to get with ads, and sure, let's hope they don't want to IPO, because that's the root of all enshittification.
Common sense can be used to sustain any stupid argument, and it should be disregarded as a valid counterpoint to anything.
Yes, please? I know "on contradiction" is in the queue. But those things take time. :D