It is impressive that you can literally say nothing
mob
joined 1 year ago
yeah, I'm fine with Linux. It was a specific question about Kalis tools
No, I think radicalization of a populous is a terrible thing. If you only want to speak on radical politics though, I also believe in it being bad in the majority of cases.
With your logic, I would have to assume you support what is happening to Gaza, Ukraine, Ethiopia, Yemen, basically all invasions, as well as the destruction in the Middle East. Also, if you'd like to apply it to American politics, I would have to assume you support all the radical stances that Republicans are pushing for, and would like the fundamental change of letting Trump be a dictator? You did say that radicalization is the only good thing?
I imagine you really think "radical politics" is only fundamental changes that you like, but that's not how it works.
And again, the initial comment was on radicalization, not radical politics, even though those are mostly a bad thing as well.
So, it seems you have no depth to what you are saying, just copy/paste comments. I thought that had to be the case
That's literally saying nothing on the initial topic, and basing the reply purely on an assumption of what you think I mean by radicalization.
Radicalization doesn't mean reactionary. Is that all you think you are saying when you say "radicalization is the only good thing?"
it is the only good thing
I'd love to hear you dive into this a little more.
Also, no need to explain what you assume I am thinking/conflating. I'd just like to hear actual thoughts from you, with hopefully some depth rather than internet copy/paste-esque comments, rather than what you think I am thinking.
I mean any voluntary, likely anonymous, internet poll is already trash
But here's the YouGov methodology. I was curious
It's a volunteer poll on the Economist. It's wild how excited people are to believe shit like this and use it to talk shit about other people.
In our poll, the proportion of respondent
A voluntary poll on the Economist, I'd bet? I'd also bet some people were trolling it. It's definitely just clickbait to get people to be cynical of other people again.
Radicalization is a bad thing.
So is extrapolating a volunteer poll on a random website to represent a demographic and using it as a fact to talk down about said demographic. But, par for course nowadays I guess
and without proper statistical method and model, you can claim anything and get a radicalized internet to believe it
I appreciate it, that is basically exactly what I am looking for. It seems like a real interesting way to learn without having to do questionably legal stuff, or have to set up a bunch of my own stuff to attempt to learn on.
Thank you!