mintdaniel42

joined 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh so you'd find it better if those greedy companies would destroy our planet, jungles and oceans full of life instead of a lifeless asteroid somewhere in the galaxy huh? Think about it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The only, really only, case in which you should plan that much into the future is when you're a gov / politician / business. Plans for the average person never work out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Signal has it yes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Could you provide the instance url?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My bad... It wasn't supposed to sound that aggressive.

And to be honest: there is no confirmation for a free tier but I strongly believe (and hope) so because most people nowadays assume everything to be free and if they see Signal not having a free backup plan everyone would go

aAhHhHHHhH they are so greedy i thought they are a non-profit.

(I mean people who don't care about privacy and only use signal because their privay-aware friends told them to)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

First of all: there will definitely be a free tier. The only thing not final is storage and media backup.

Second: local backup will most likely still be an option.

Why do people always hate on new features? Just don't use them if you don't want to

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Then just use the free tier

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

No i think you misunderstood. Local backups (as we have them now) will (most likely) stay.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm gonna be honest. I chose a random article by JWZ and read it. The only thing they are talking about is the contact discovery system. If they don't want contacts to be uploaded (encrypted) then simply don't give signal the permission. And that the author moves to facebook messenger because there

at least the privacy failings are obvious

just shows how the author isn't even interested in secure and private messaging but only in defamig signal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yes you are right but the website links github commits as sources

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've been using Matrix for a few days now and I have to say that encryption is a mess. Rooms and Spaces are not encrypted. 1:1 chats are encrypted but before it worked for my account (whysoever) I had to verify the other person. Also fluffychat is really buggy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yes it seems like Thunder for some reason does it that way

23
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

We are getting Cloud Backups in the future! Currently, there are two tiers planned:

The free tier offers:

  • 30 days of media backup
  • ??? GB of storage

The paid ($3 / mo) tier offers:

  • media & text backup forever
  • 1TB of storage Both tiers' features and the pricing of the paid plan are still subject to change

What do you think about this?

Sources: SignalUpdateInfo

15
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Many of us (or at least me) would probably like to see Signal getting decentralized. Here are a few thoughts I had about this recently.

First let me define three persons:

  • Peter (using the official signal.org instance)
  • Ted (using the example.com instance)
  • Andrew (using his own instance under andrew.chat)

Couldn't we use the upcoming username feature to build a decentralized signal network? For example with a modified client or maybe just a modified libsignal library we could parse the instance from the username which would look like an email address ([email protected] or [email protected]). If the username doesn't have a domain part it just uses the default instance (so Peter just has the username peter.94).

Maybe we have some people here who are already familiar with the Signal codebase and willing to assist?

EDIT: Yes I know Session and Matrix exist but Session is to extreme and technical and Matrix is more focused on communities and groups which aren't even encrypted. Besides that both of them have a much smaller userbase compared to Signal.

view more: next ›