loxdogs

joined 1 year ago
[–] loxdogs -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sorry, by saying "in a world of Ayn Rand" I meant her philosophy. That's my mistake and I will try not to do it again.

Well, the true communism is achieved when everything is everyone, all are equal in their, including people. You can have sex with whom you want. If someone, doesn't matter who, can sex with another person, so can you. I maybe mistaken, but book "we" explains it greatly.

Few people earn all their surplus honestly, and I am sure you have nothing against those. Others who don't(stole, lie, decieve) to achieve fortune are not objectivists. They are one of many reasons people hate capitalism in fact and I agree with this.

[–] loxdogs -2 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Well, you are getting paid for your work, by someone who managed to get the business going, all hard things aside.

[–] loxdogs -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Wait, so if a person pays government to buy land, pays architect, providing him a job, to make a project of a factory, pays construction company to build factory, pays other different factories to buy machines for his factory, hires workers and pays them to work and produce goods is being parasite? Did I get it right?

[–] loxdogs -5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

If by workers we consider everyone, who's working with their hands and minds, getting paid for this, than I agree. It's not different from Ayn Rand's philosophy.

If by workers we consider only people who work with hands on a factory, than no. Without proper education, you can't make blueprint of machine. To be more clear - good machine.

If none of this, I am ready to listen to your explanation

[–] loxdogs -3 points 1 year ago (24 children)

That's not an explanation... I am only asking to explain in other way, I could understand. I can admit, that I am wrong, if objective reasoning is heavy enough for me to say "yeah man, whis Ayn Rand is such a parasite", but I don't see it, or don't understand

[–] loxdogs 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you please tell me the chapter, I don't remember this moment, to be honest. I would like to reread it

[–] loxdogs -5 points 1 year ago (42 children)

In a world of Ayn Rand everyone also works together. She wrote, that people should work with each other. They will benefit from this. One person is not capable of doing everything. However, you can choose who to work with. You would always want to work with someone who does everything right and in time.

All people are not equal, and that is a fact, but in rational world they can work hard to be noticed by another rational person. You don't judge by the look of their skin, cloths or fortune. You judge by the way they think. There would be no slaves, those who worked hard would earn more.

The machines are built by workers, but who made the blueprint? They sold it or shared it to make life more comfortable for themselves, thus making the progress. You will end up with better and more goods. This is one of the reasons you must value yourself.

Money is virtue, because it's one of the least thing people agreed on as equal value to something. I really don't want to barter for the new phone, to be honest.

It's a problem, that you are not getting paid enough, but that's not problem of the money, that's people who are paying less are a problem.

Communism isn't equal too. You, in fact, would get paid the same amount as everyone else. What's the point of doing better and more, if you get paid the same?

So I still don't understand to be honest, are there other explanations? With all my pleasure, if everything is shared, I do not want to share my woman with someone, who needs it more. Share my workplace with someone who needs it more, but I will give it to someone, who's better than me. Share my payment, because someone needs it more. If I want to, I have some surplus and I won't need it, than sure, I will share. I won't do it mandatory.

[–] loxdogs -3 points 1 year ago

How is he a path to that failure? I still don't understand

[–] loxdogs -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And what's wrong with Trump? Not ideologicaly, but economically and politically?

[–] loxdogs 4 points 1 year ago

Walking without a torch in Rattay at night

view more: ‹ prev next ›