laughterlaughter

joined 11 months ago
[–] laughterlaughter 1 points 5 months ago

Ah man, shucks.

[–] laughterlaughter 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Oh, I understand. I'm just saying that the reasons were enough for a lot of people to give it a go, me included. You probably had a beefed up machine back then in 2008. I didn't, and launching a browser took several seconds, whereas Chrome launched like in one second or so.

Of course, Chrome started to suck and I came back to Firefox, especially when they caught up with Javascript.

[–] laughterlaughter 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You're comparing board game companies with a laptop manufacturing company, right?

A company manufacturing a laptop like the Framework laptop is not just sourcing parts and assembling them together. There's a LOT of work put in it, way more than some board game.

Their laptop costs in the thousands, and given their (so far) niche market, I can see why it isn't feasible for them to give away these expensive to manufacture machines to community ambassadors.

[–] laughterlaughter 5 points 5 months ago

Everything you said, I've already known. Most people don't care about their browsers/ad-ridden smart TVs (yuck), spying phones, etc, etc.

But the article posted here is not for them. It's for the people who care.

And that's all I'm saying. You pretty much said at the beginning "Who cares?" for which I replied "Well, clearly not you, but other people do care."

[–] laughterlaughter 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (11 children)

My point is that none of those forks have to start from scratch if Firefox disappears. One of them will replace it.

As long as a browser is good enough for browsing the net, I'm okay with it.

I don't need, for example, DRM. If half of the web uses it, and a new browser alternative doesn't support it, then fuck it. The other half is still hundreds of millions of web pages for me to consume.

[–] laughterlaughter 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Sure, but the article author is quite likely not the target audience for Firefox.

I don't follow the relevance of that statement.

"People focus WAY TOO MUCH on space rockets! I don't care about them that much!"

"Ok, that means the article is not for you."

"Sure, but the article author is not the target audience for space rockets."

Okay?

[–] laughterlaughter 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Chrome was so lightweight and fast when it was launched. And it had a blazing fast Javascript engine. No other engine came close to it.

It was a pretty awesome browser back then during the "do no evil" era of Google.

[–] laughterlaughter 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] laughterlaughter 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (13 children)

Not true.

Navigator died a horrible death, and Phoenix (later Firefox), being a fork of it, survived just fine.

[–] laughterlaughter 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

That was after the reddit migration. Lemmy was much better before the reddit doom-and-gloom gang made themselves home.

[–] laughterlaughter 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

FUCK U.S. politics creeping in every non-US politics thread.

[–] laughterlaughter 6 points 5 months ago

You're being downvoted by clueless people.

view more: ‹ prev next ›