laughterlaughter

Yes.

Voting for personal curation in an all feed is contrary to the shared nature of posts.

But where's the evidence that there is "voting for personal curation" happening? Have you been DM'd by people saying "Stop posting this content to my All feed"?

The truth of the matter is, it's an allowed action.

That's like servers complaining about patrons going to a restaurant 10 minutes before closing time. They say "such inconsiderate people! Now we have to stay until they're done!" When in reality, it's not the patrons' fault. It's management's fault. Personally, if I was a restaurant owner that closes at 10pm, I'd post a note saying "last time to serve walk-ins: 9:15pm. Patrons must leave by 10:15pm, no exceptions" out of respect for my employees.

Same deal. Don't complain to people doing a perfectly valid action regardless of intention. Complain to the admins or Lemmy's devs.

Is it self-centered if a lot of people do it, though? Is voting "a self-centered" action, or a community one?

But that's besides the point.

My point is that it doesn't matter why they do it. The platform allows it, so it's fair game. If it wasn't, then admins should have an option to disable voting from people who are (1) browsing All and (2) not subscribed.

Thank you. Very informative.

So, do not train other LLMs with it.

Do not use it in hugely successful global products.

Thank you!

I'm not saying that everyone will psychopathic tendencies would be harmless; but definitely way less.

Let's put it this way, although I concede that it's not a perfect analogy: those stats about the risk of death increasing in a household after someone in it purchases a gun? Same deal. The father, the son, the daughter may think "I'm going to kill this mf one day!!" But that day never comes. Oh, but a gun is all of a sudden available? It's very easy, in those circumstances, for someone with those thoughts to just go get it a brandish it.

How about the reverse, when it actually is something positive? In my hometown in the late 90s, people started complaining that "so many gays invaded our city." Nope, "them gays" were always in the city, in the closet. Then a new message, spread through the internet, saying that it was okay to be gay. And people realized, "hey there's actually many more of us in our city. I'm not alone!" and they were emboldened to just come out of the closet. That's a positive situation, like I said.

Thanks. I know all this; I was just lazy and continued to use the terminology used in the post or thread.

So, what are the restrictions? That you can't use them commercially, for example?

And if an average Joe wants to re-create a "for personal use" Jarvis, what would they use today?

Yes, I've lived in Europe. And no, this is not an America problem. It's a humanity problem.

Christianity, the nazis, Scientology, "the Swifties," the countless sects, schemes like Herbalife and their "cult of success," hell, the sports fans willing to beat up others because they use a shirt of a different color!

You use the term "interesting" as if it was a very novel concept. It isn't. Or am I wrong for having perceived it that way?

For example: sex offenders are a global thing. Go to freaking Stavanger, Norway, and you'll find people you can't reason with about "rape bad, m'kay?"

I'm sorry, but if people browse All, and are allowed to downvote what's in there, how is that their fault? It's an allowed use case of the Lemmy platform.

It's like telling people not to use the chainsaw in Quake "because they're too lazy to use other weapons."

What are the restrictions?

Are there any open source models people would normally use?

Is this really "beauty"? Don't get me wrong; Barcelona is awesome. But I see those "gated structures" and I think more of Judge Dredd 3D.

Images of S Pain!!!!