jramskov

joined 2 years ago
[–] jramskov -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You can find videos with him discussing rocket engines in details - he’s spent years working together with a lot of brilliant car and rocket engineers. He (again, not alone, of course) somehow managed to build a successful car company and a successful Space company. Both things are by all accounts very difficult. Not likely to be done by a stupid person.

I fully agree he’s a jerk and I would never want to work for him, but that doesn’t mean he’s stupid or that I can’t be impressed by what SpaceX has achieved.

[–] jramskov -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes, I’m fully aware of it. Very cool, but it never got any further than the prototype stage AFAIK - SpaceX made it work and has lowered the price to orbit considerably and the rest of the industry is scrambling to catch up.

Scientists are really looking forward to Starship because of the incredible potential it provides. If SpaceX manages to get it working, it’ll likely change space exploration in a massive way. I find that quite exciting.

[–] jramskov -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Of course he didn’t do it himself, but according to people that actually worked closely with him, he’s not exactly stupid and actually knows quite a bit about both.

Why he’s behaving so stupidly and handling Twitter so badly, I have no idea - he’s really a jerk.

[–] jramskov 3 points 2 years ago

I have added an update to my previous post. I think we just misunderstand each other.

Of course there are people believing all kinds of crazy shit, like the Earth being flat. I don’t see how that is relevant?

Von Braun was amazing.

[–] jramskov 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Okay, trying to say it in another way: I don’t think many people thought SpaceX had much chance of success or becoming basically the #1 in the industry, far ahead of everyone else.

I don’t buy your sci-fi argument. Do people also think time travel will be possible?

[–] jramskov 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’ll try to formulate my comments better in the future - English isn’t my native language.

[–] jramskov 3 points 2 years ago

I don’t think others are much better if at all.

[–] jramskov 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You're requesting something impossible for me, making it irrelevant. I also don’t make any claims about thinness. I’m just saying I think Apple with all their amazing engineers would be able to solve it.

I don’t know whether this requirement is generally relevant for most users, it might not be, but I think we should strive for devices that are as easy as possible to repair to give them a longer life. An iPhone have immensely capable hardware these days - the other bit is of course software support.

[–] jramskov 1 points 2 years ago

I don’t know what that includes, but I’d like expect the EU wouldn’t like it if it requires a lot of special tools.

[–] jramskov 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Don’t be silly. You almost make it sound like the EU is a big evil monster. I honestly don’t see a push to make batteries easier to replace a bad thing. I also don’t think it would be hard for Apple to design their products with that feature in mind. Well, perhaps the AirPods, but certainly not the iPhone and if anyone have the skills to do it and the money too…I’d say it’s Apple. Apple of course don’t like to be restricted, they want to keep tight control over everything.

[–] jramskov 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It does apply to all devices as far as I understand, this isn’t Apple specific at all.

view more: ‹ prev next ›