You most certainly can. The discussion about whether copyright applies to the output is nuanced but certainly valid, and notably separate from whether copyright allows copyright holders to restrict who or what gets trained on their work after it's released for general consumption.
The article is literally about someone suing to prevent their art from being used for training. That's the topic at hand.
Are you confused, or are you trying to shoehorn a different but related discussion into this one?
I was under the impression we were talking about using copyright to prevent a work from being used to train a generative model. There's nothing in copyright that says anything about training anything. I'm not even convinced there should be.
There's nothing in copyright law that covers this scenario, so anyone that says it's "absolutely" one way or the other is telling you an opinion, not a fact.
I don't grasp the point you're making; can you elaborate?
In that case, I agree. There's no sane reason for weed to be illegal in a country where alcohol is not.
What does this mean? Like, a 10 year old can walk into a grocery store and buy a tomato. Is that what you mean? Or did you mean legalize it like alcohol?
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty confident that you can't use something with a lower standard of proof as evidence in a trial that requires a higher standard of proof. Civil cases only need to be proven by the standard "a preponderance of evidence", whereas criminal trials are required to proven "beyond a reasonable doubt".
It's probably okay in the other direction, though.
Well feel free to drop a DM to me directly when you get it up and running and I'll give it a look, for sure.
I would probably watch a youtube channel that focused more on how to improvise in cooking than how to follow a recipe, along with pointing out various useful techniques and pitfalls to avoid.
Hell, this might actually already exist. I confess I've never really looked.
I subscribed to releases! Good work so far!
Are you speaking legally or morally when you say someone "aught" to do something?