Yes, because it seems in this instance the answer to the question is "no, please don't plug into the ports you find."
If it's a supported thing, the librarian may have been less blustery.
jeeva
joined 2 years ago
I enjoyed this write-up.
Out of interest, have you seen the recent headlines around Windows 11 stopping working on unsupported hardware that it had been installed on anyway?
Or, to use your example, reviews that don't understand the product or play it for laughs. 😅
Well, okay - here's my reasoning:
I have a PC and a PS5.
If the game is on PC, I would prefer to play it there. It is a competitor, in my household (I'd argue elsewhere, too, but I guess that's an opinion). It is a very useful distinction for me.
There are few games I can only get on my PS5, but that low number does sometimes make me ask why I have a PS5. It is useful to distinguish between the games I can only play on PS5, and those I could instead play on PC, for that reason.
I hugely prefer this world in which Sony releases for my preferred platform, but that doesn't mean it's sensible to say that PC isn't a competitor to consoles and bury your head in the sand because it "devalue[s] pro-consumer behaviour".
The "I" in "LLM" stands for intelligence.
Hold up. Digital zoom is, in all the cases I'm currently aware of, just cropping the available data. That's not reconstruction, it's just losing data.
Otherwise, yep, I'm with you there.
I don't think loss is what people are worried about, really - more injecting details that fit the training data but don't exist in the source.
Given the hoopla Hollywood and directors made about frame-interpolation, do you think generated frames will be any better/more popular?
Neat, thanks!
Oh, intrigue. I got an invite way back, but didn't sign the NDA in time, assumed that was it for my chances. They're still inviting folk?
Like what?
What moderation do you mean?