jak

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (27 children)

So how do they need less food than they consume? Because we feed them silage, plus a lot more food.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why? Food production through livestock is a waste of calories, land, and greenhouse gases

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (29 children)

So you’re saying that livestock is exclusively fed off of byproducts of human vegetable production? That’s incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

How do you get the silage from the farms to the now reduced livestock? Less livestock means a longer average trip.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

We can turn silage into ethanol, fertilizer, or whiskey, it doesn’t go to waste.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (41 children)

It’s not. Livestock needs more silage than we would produce for ourselves and creates additional waste products in the form of greenhouse gases while digesting the silage. If we reduced the amount of livestock, you’d have to increase transportation costs to get the silage to the animals. They’re just not an efficient addition to the system on a large scale at all

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (43 children)

So? There’s more than enough space to grow more without approaching the greenhouse gas levels of meat production. If 30% of crop yields were inedible, that would still be far less waste than happens due to eating on a higher trophic level.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Right, I agree with you about that, but believe you’re using too broad a brush here, I don’t know if that was clear.

There’s a huge difference between ineffective herbal mixtures that are being predatorily advertised to people with chronic illnesses and this, imo. This is more akin to your dentist telling you to rinse with homemade saline solution if you can’t afford mouthwash- it’s a scientifically well established disinfectant, just made at home.

I think it’s wonderful that Brazil’s researching folk cures, too often they’re unresearched by the academic community, even though they’ve been in some cases (not all) used effectively for centuries. I appreciate you wanting to wait until there’s been rigorous academic testing, and I do think that’s the right thing to do, if it’s something that you can do. If you’re in a situation where you don’t have that option, it’s not as easy, in my opinion. Especially because there’s a huge backlog of traditional remedies to test, and not all governments are so open to testing them at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Connecticut here, what the absolute fuck. I’m wearing so much flannel

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Willow bark was generally used for headaches and body aches, similarly to how it is today. The same could be said for tons of other medications. It’s perfectly fine to choose not to use them, but a home remedy is not inherently unscientific or dangerous.

view more: ‹ prev next ›