jaaake

joined 2 years ago
[–] jaaake -5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yes! Literally this is what I’m trying to say!

[–] jaaake -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Completely agree, DNC & GOP are far too similar. I’m focused on the differences between them. They are also significant.

There is no net negative of increasing exposure for PSL. Increasing PSL exposure is a good thing. The net negative is in voting PSL on a presidential ballot. There are not enough people concentrated in any area for PSL to register enough to cause any exposure. It simply won’t register in a contest this large. Voting PSL in that contest is only taking votes away from one of the two parties that are going to win. If we can agree that DNC and GOP have differences between them, then those differences should be enough to decide where to spend your vote in that contest. The net negative comes in where the vote for PSL could have fallen in one of the two columns that matter in this contest. Instead of going in those columns, it causes those columns to come up one vote short.

Having a PSL candidate that gained 16% running for Mayor of Long Beach in 2010 is a great way to increase exposure. That’s a blip that registers. That’s only possible in local elections at the moment.

[–] jaaake -2 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I don’t understand why you can’t recognize that you can do both. Voting to mitigate as much damage as possible doesn’t mean DON’T organize and protect yourself. Casting a vote for the party that is less likely to trample individual rights in less arenas is more effective than wasting a vote on something that has a net negative effect. Voting is the absolute minimum and takes near zero time and effort and has potential (depending on where you live) to affect millions of lives.

[–] jaaake -1 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Reject both all you want. One will run the country in 4 months.

[–] jaaake 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] jaaake -3 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Your choices for the presidential election are DNC and GOP. If you think that those options are completely equivocal, I don’t think this conversation is worth continuing.

[–] jaaake -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The only way it’s best to protest under Trump is if you want to die while protesting.

[–] jaaake -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That tells me that increasing suffering isn't actually relevant.

Big oof

[–] jaaake -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That’s what happens when you don’t vote or vote for a third party.

[–] jaaake 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Police killings have gone up every single year under Biden, yet the streets are empty.

That’s a great stat that should be shared more widely.

We don't need to increase suffering, we need liberals to stop pretending everything is fine.

Agreed!

If you think those numbers won’t continue to rise under a Trump regime, you and I have irreconcilable differences of opinion

[–] jaaake -2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

If any third party showed any chance of winning at the local level, the DNC and GOP would collaborate against them. We have seen this in Georgia, where they kicked PSL off the ballot. The only way to legitimately get somebody not in the DNC or GOP in power is via Revolution.

Local is smaller than state. State still has too much money and will trounce smaller parties just like you said. Looking at PSLs election results, the only showings of note are board seats, city council, and mayor. That’s where we need to start.

I’m not saying this is the only path forward. I’m all for guillotines, but you need the people on your side for that and getting the people aware of the movement is a tough process.

view more: ‹ prev next ›